COMPROMISE AGREEMENTS AS A TOOL FOR JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS IN OLD POLISH-LITHUANIAN COMMONWEALTH (BASED ON JUDICIAL MATERIALS OF THE RUTHENIAN VOIVODESHIP IN THE 17th – 18th CENTURIES)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24919/2519-058X.37.346066Abstract
The purpose of the study is to clarify the role and place of compromise agreements in the judicial system of Old Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. The research methodology is based on the principles of scientific historicism, the use of general scientific and highly specialized historical methods. Scientific novelty consists in a comprehensive analysis of the activities of compromise courts in the territory of the Ruthenian Voivodeship of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in the 17th – 18th centuries, as an integral part of judicial proceedings. The procedural aspect of the court's activities has been reconstructed: composition, prerequisites for formation, topics of cases considered, etc. Conclusions. Compromise agreements were widely used in an everyday legal practice of the Old Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth society as a tool for resolving conflicts. The acts of the hrodsky (magistrates') and zemstvo courts contain hundreds of references and the agreements texts, and it testifies to their importance. The participants of compromise agreements were two parties who were on equal terms. Each of them was represented by the so-called “friend”, it could be one or several people. In the 18th century the board of friends was headed by a super-arbitrator. Also in the 18th century the compromise court could use the services of vozny and other officials of local judicial and administrative institutions. Compromise agreements could be concluded between the parties who were conducting legal proceedings in the existing permanent courts. They could equally be concluded at different stages: at the beginning of legal proceedings, at the end, etc. Compromise courts covered a wide range of civil and criminal cases. Thus, they could make decisions that provided not only for material aspects, but also for imprisonment, deprivation of honour, etc.
Key words: compromise courts, Ruthenian voivodeship, judicial proceedings of the Old Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, compromise agreements, mediation.
References
Balzer, O. (1935). Przewód sądowy polski w zarysie [Outline of the Polish Judicial Procedure]. Lwów: Nakł. Towarzystwa Naukowego. [in Polish].
Bardach, J., Leśnodorski, B., & Pietrzak, M. (2009). Historia ustroju i prawa polskiego [History of the Polish System and Law]. 6th revised ed. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. [in Polish].
Boiko, I. Y. (2009). Organy vlady i pravo v Halychyni u skladi Polskoho Korolivstva (1349–1569 rr.) [Authorities and Law in Galicia as Part of the Polish Kingdom (1349–1569)]. Lviv: Vydavnychyi tsentr Lvivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. I. Franka. [in Ukrainian].
Dąbkowski, P. (1910–1911). Prawo prywatne polskie [Polish Private Law]. Vol. 1–2. Lwów: Nakł. Towarzystwa Naukowego. [in Polish].
Domino, W. (1938). Sądownictwo polubowne na Rusi w późniejszym średniowieczu [Arbitration Judiciary in Ruthenia in the Late Middle Ages]. Vol. 1. Lwów: Nakładem autora. [in Polish].
Hoshko, Yu. (1999). Narodne pravo ukraintsiv XVI–XVIII st. [Customary Law of Ukrainians in the 16th–18th Centuries]. Lviv: Instytut narodoznavstva NAN Ukrainy. [in Ukrainian].
Inkin, V. (1990). Stat'i Russkoi Pravdy o mesti v svete obychnoy praktiki galitskikh obshchinnikh sudov (po aktam XVI–XVIII vv.) [Articles of the Russkaya Pravda on Vengeance in the Light of Customary Practice of Galician Magistrates' Courts (based on 16th–18th-century acts)]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Nauchnyi zhurnal. Seriya 8: Istoriya, 1 (January–February), 72–85. [in Russian].
Kutszeba, S. (1927). Dawne polskie prawo sądowe w zarysie [Outline of the Old Polish Judicial Law]. 2nd ed. Lwów–Warszawa–Kraków: Księgarnia Polska. [in Polish].
Płaza, S. (1997). Historia prawa w Polsce na tle porównawczym. Cz. 1: X–XVIII w. [History of Law in Poland in a Comparative Context. Part 1: 10th–18th centuries]. Kraków: Kantor Wydawniczy Zakamycze. [in Polish].
Rafacz, J. (1936). Dawne sądowe prawo polskie w zarysie [Outline of Old Polish Judicial Law]. Warszawa: Nakł. Towarzystwa Naukowego. [in Polish].
Smutok, I., Ilnytskyi, V., & Haliv, M. (2024). Hroshovyi obih u Ruskomu voievodstvi periodu Rechi Pospolytoi (persha polovyna XVIII st.) za pysemnymy dzherelamy [Money circulation in the Ruthenian Voivodeship of Rzeczpospolita period (the first half of the 18th century) according to written records]. The Ukrainian Numismatic Annual, (8), 258–269. DOI: 10.31470/2616-6275-2024-8-258-269 [in Ukrainian].
Starchenko, N. (2004). Poliubovni sudy na Volyni v ostannii tretyni XVI st. [Compromise Courts in Volhynia in the Last Third of the 16th Century]. In: Do dzherel: Zbirnyk naukovykh pratsʹ na poshanu Oleha Kupchynsʹkoho z nahody yoho 70-richchia, (pp. 345–359). Kyiv–Lviv: Instytut ukraïnoznavstva NAN Ukrainy. [in Ukrainian].
Tsentralnyi derzhavnyi istorychnyi arkhiv Ukrainy u Lvovi [Central State Historical Archives of Ukraine in Lviv – СSHAUL].
Viddil rukopysiv Naukovoi biblioteky Lvivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Franka [Manuscripts Department of the Scientific Library of the Ivan Franko Lviv National University – MD SL LNU].
Zazulyak, Yu. (2004). Zi sposterezhenʹ nad praktykoiu poliubovnoho sudochynstva u Rusʹkomu voievodstvi u XV st. [Observations on the Practice of Compromise Courts in the Ruthenian Voivodeship in the 15th Century]. Ruthenica, 3, 101–120. [in Ukrainian].
Zazulyak, Yu. (2007). Remeslo superarbitra: Shliakhetsʹki konflikty ta poliubovni zamyrennia u Rusʹkomu voievodstvi pochatku XVI st. [The Craft of a Super-arbitrator: Noble Conflicts and Compromise Agreements in the Ruthenian Voivodeship of the Early 16th Century]. Sotsium: Almanakh sotsialnoi istorii – Sotsium: Almanac of Social History, 7, 85–102. [in Ukrainian].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
