MEMORIAL LEGISLATION OF EASTERN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES: BETWEEN ETHNOPOPULISM AND MNEMONIC SECURITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24919/2519-058X.34.324614Abstract
The purpose of the research is to identify the main directions of memorial legislation development in Eastern European countries at the present stage, in particular, in the context of determining its functioning in the coordinates of the ethnopopulist rhetoric growth of the respective political regimes and clarifying the degree of mnemonic security, which we could come across in the memorial legislation. Scientific Novelty. Regarding the idea that memory management in contemporary politics has important ramifications for the retreat from democracy, the Eastern European region offers food for thought. At the same time, the analysis of the Russian, Polish and Ukrainian legislative regulation of historical memory emphasizes that the “wars of memory” are unfolding as proxy wars for modern state identities and the sense of the states security as actors of a special kind. Eastern Europe has become the “main laboratory” for studying the interrelationships between law and memory since the mid-2000s. Memory wars have broken out in the Russian-Ukrainian-Polish triangle, and historical politics, including memory laws, have become the weapon that regimes consciously relied on in their propaganda. The countries in the region have struggled for the mnemonic acknowledgment in the global social hierarchy of remembrance of the major historical events, as evidenced by their memorial laws. Conclusions. Due to determining the main directions of functioning in the mnemonic space of Europe regarding memory laws in the countries of its eastern part, it is feasible to bring up their striking difference from the generally accepted policy of memory in the EU. The tangible ethno-populist rhetoric is considered to be one of the controversial issue, which is inherent in such memorial legislative acts. On the other hand, the example of modern Ukraine, which is in a state of fierce and hostile war with Russia, allows us to realize the powerful potential of the mnemonic security of such legislation more deeply.
Key words: Eastern Europe, memorial legislation, memory laws, historical politics, historical memory, ethno-populism, mnemonic security.
References
Belavusau, U. (2018). Final Thoughts on Mnemonic Constitutionalism. VerfBlog, URL: https://verfassungsblog.de/final-thoughts-on-mnemonic-constitutionalism. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17176/20180115-130117. [in English]
Belavusau, U. (2023). Law and the Politics of Memory. In: M. Mälksoo (Ed.). Handbook on the Politics of Memory, (pp. 65–80). Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800372535.00011. [in English]
Belavusau, U. (2020). Mnemonic Constitutionalism and Rule of Law in Hungary and Russia. Interdisciplinary Journal of Populism, 1(1), 16–29. [in English]
Belavusau, U., Gliszczyńska-Grabias, A., & Mälksoo, M. (2021). Memory Laws and Memory Wars in Poland, Russia and Ukraine. Jahrbuch des Öffentlichen Rechts, 69, 95–116. DOI: 10.1628/joer-2021-0005. [in English]
Bucholc, M. (2019). Commemorative Lawmaking: Memory Frames of the Democratic Backsliding in Poland After 2015. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 11, 85–110. DOI: 10.1007/s40803-018-0080-7. [in English]
Cherviatsova, A. (2020). On the frontline of European memory wars: memory laws and policy in Ukraine. European Papers, 5(1), 119–136. DOI: 10.15166/2499-8249/387. [in English]
Gliszczyńska-Grabias, A. (2014). Memory Laws or Memory Loss? Europe in Search of Its Historical Identity through the National and International Law. Polish Yearbook of International Law, 34, 161–186. [in English]
Gustafsson, K., & Mälksoo, M. (2024). Memory-Political Deterrence: Shielding Collective Memory and Ontological Security through Dissuasion. International Studies Quarterly, 68(1), 1–12. DOI: 10.1093/isq/sqae006. [in English]
Ivangorodsky, K. (2023). Memorialne zakonodavstvo RF yak zasib okupatsiinoi polityky: istoryko-pravovyi analiz [Memorial legislation of the Russian Federation as occupation policy tool: historical and legal analysis]. Visnyk Cherkaskoho universytetu. Seriia: Istorychni nauky – Bulletin of Cherkasy University. The series “Historical Sciences”, 1, 78–92. DOI: 10.31651/2076-5908-2023-1-78-92. [in Ukrainian]
Kahn, R. (2018). Free Speech, Official History and Nationalist Politics: Toward a Typology of Objections to Memory Laws. Florida Journal of International Law, 31(1), 33–53. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3299751. [in English]
Kasianov, G. (2018). Past continuous: istorychna polityka 1980-kh ‒ 2000-kh. Ukraina ta susidy [Past continuous: historical politics of the 1980s – 2000s. Ukraine and neighbors]. Kyiv: Laurus. [in Ukrainian]
Kasianov, G. (2022). Memory Crash. Politics of History in and around Ukraine, 1980s–2010s. Budapest: CEU Press, 2022. 418 p. [in English]
Koch, S. (2018). Memorialna polityka susidiv Ukrainy: vid stratehii natsionalnoho suverenitetu do “Velykykh derzhav” [Memorial policy of Ukraine’s neighbors: from the strategy of national sovereignty to the “Great States”]. Politykus, 4, 46–50. [in Ukrainian]
Koposov, N. (2020). Historians, Memory Laws, and the Politics of the Past. European Papers, 5(1), 107–117. DOI: 10.15166/2499-8249/390. [in English]
Koposov, N. (2018). Memory Laws: Historical Evidence in Support of the “Slippery Slope” Argument. VerfBlog. URL: https://verfassungsblog.de/memory-laws-historical-evidence-in-support-of-the-slippery-slope-argument. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17176/20180108-150448. [in English]
Koposov, N. (2022). Populism and Memory: Legislation of the Past in Poland, Ukraine, and Russia. East European Politics and Societies and Cultures, 36 (1), 272–297. DOI: 10.1177/0888325420950806. [in English]
Krawatzek, F., & Soroka, G. (2022). Circulation, Conditions, Claims: Examining the Politics of Historical Memory in Eastern Europe. East European Politics and Societies, 36 (1), 198–224. DOI: 10.1177/0888325420969786. [in English]
Latysh, Yu. (2022). Sekiurytyzatsiia istorychnoi pamiati pid chas rosiisko-ukrainskoi viiny [Securitization of Historical Memory during the Russian-Ukrainian war]. Naukovi pratsi Kamianets-Podilskoho natsionalnoho universytetu: istorychni nauky – Scientific Papers of the Kamianets-Podilskyi National University. History, 38, 178–188. DOI: 10.32626/2309-2254.2022-38.178-188. [in Ukrainian]
Lucksted, D. (2022). Memory laws, mnemonic weapons: The diffusion of a norm across Europe and beyond. Memory Studies, 15(6), 1449–1469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980221134036. [in English]
Mälksoo, M. (2015). “Memory must be defended”: Beyond the politics of mnemonical security. Security Dialogue, 46(3), 221–237. DOI: 10.1177/0967010614552549. [in English]
Mälksoo, M. (2021). Captive minds: The function and agency of Eastern Europe in International Security Studies. Journal of International Relations and Development, 24(4), 866–889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-021-00230-2. [in English]
Mälksoo, M. (2021b). Militant memocracy in International Relations: Mnemonical status anxiety and memory laws in Eastern Europe. Review of International Studies, 47(4), 489–507. DOI: 10.1017/s0260210521000140. [in English]
Mälksoo, M. (2021c). Who’s afraid of memory laws? Introducing ‘militant memocracy’ in International Relations. British International Studies Association. 13 April. URL: https://www.bisa.ac.uk/articles/whos-afraid-memory-laws-introducing-militant-memocracy-international-relations. [in English]
Mälksoo, M. (2023). The Postcolonial Moment in Russia’s War Against Ukraine. Journal of Genocide Research, 25(3–4), 471–481. DOI: 10.1080/14623528.2022.2074947. [in English]
Mälksoo, M. (2023b). Politics of memory: a conceptual introduction. In: M. Mälksoo (Ed.). Handbook on the Politics of Memory, (pp. 1–16). Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: 10.4337/9781800372535. [in English]
Müller, J.-W. (2016). What Is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. [in English]
Olick, J. (2016) Foreword. In: Pakier, M. and Wawrzyniak, J. (eds) Memory and Changes in Europe: Eastern Perspectives, (pp. IX–XII). London: Berghahn. [in English]
Saryusz-Wolska, M., Wawrzyniak, J., & Wóycicka, Z. (2022). New constellations of mnemonic wars: An introduction. Memory Studies, 15(6), 1275–1288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980221133733. [in English]
Soroka, G. (2022). Recalling Katyń: Poland, Russia, and the Interstate Politics of History. East European Politics and Societies, 36 (1), 328–355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325420983433. [in English]
Törnquist-Plewa, B., & Yurchuk, Yu. (2019). Memory politics in contemporary Ukraine: Reflections from the postcolonial perspective. Memory Studies, 12(6), 699–720. DOI: 10.1177/1750698017727806. [in English]
Wójcik, A. (2023). Memory Laws, Rule of Law, and Democratic Backsliding: The Case of Poland. Journal of Illiberalism Studies, 3(3), 71–87. DOI: 10.53483/XCNV3562. [in English]
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
