LATE POLISH ENLIGHTENMENT AND THE RUTHENIAN ISSUE (THE END OF THE 18th – BEGINNING OF THE 19th CENTURY)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24919/2519-058X.28.287564

Abstract

The purpose of the article to elucidate the influence peculiarities of the Enlightenment on the views formation about the nation in general and the Ruthenian issue in the Polish society at the end of the 18th century and the beginning of the 19th century. To analyze how the worldview foundations laid by the Enlightenment influenced the reception of the Ruthenians by the Poles. The research methodology is based on the principles of historicism, scientific research. In the research there have been used general scientific principles of analysis, synthesis and generalization. The scientific novelty consists in the analysis of the Ruthenian issue through the prism of the Polish Enlightenment, and also in tracing the influence of the Enlightenment on the Polish scientific thought after the partitions of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. It has been clarified how socio-political views influenced the cameralistic studies of the Polish scholars. The meaning of the term “Ukraine” in the ideas of the Polish figures of that time has been studied. The Conclusion. The development of enlightened ideas in the territory of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth caused radical social transformations. There was a change in the very understanding of the word “enlightenment”: from education or training without any religious content to the use of this word in opposition to the words “superstition” and “fanaticism”, which contributed to the growth of a religious tolerance in the country. The spread of enlightened ideas in the Polish lands is also connected with a social demand of the population to solve the problems of the political system. There appeared research papers with a moderate criticism of noble democracy and the ideas of Sarmatism, which were associated with traditions, the connection with which was often interpreted by enlightened people negatively. There was transition from reception of a person as a subject belonging to a certain ancestry to a broader category – the Motherland. Such conceptual changes in the minds of the Polish intellectuals led to the interpretation of the Ruthenians as part of the Polish nation. After all, for the Polish intellectuals of that time, the nation was a political community, and ethnic and cultural features were not of a particular importance. This conclusion is confirmed by the analyzed letters, papers, acts of F. Jezierski, H. Kołłątaj, T. Kościuszko, S. Staszic, T. Czacki, which show us that religion receded into the background, and state affiliation and common history became more important. The consolidating factor was to become the Polish language, which was to spread to religious rites, education, etc. In the era of the late Polish Enlightenment (1795 – 1822), an important change took place in the consciousness of the Polish public figures. They began to move away from didacticism, and the main emphasis was placed on proving through science, literature and education the viability of the Polish nation under the conditions of statelessness. It was at that time that the papers of T. Czacki, T. Święcki and W. Marczyński appeared with descriptions of the territories of the former Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. These research papers are characterized by the fact that all the territories of the former Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth are considered as its integral parts and there is no focus on ethnic differences of inhabitants of these territories. It is obvious that this happened because of political reception of the nation.

Key words: Polish enlightenment, Ruthenian issue, F. Jezierski, T. Święcki, W. Marczyński

References

Askenazi, S. & Dzwonkowski, W. (Comps.). (1918). Akty powstania Kościuszki [Acts of the Kosciuszko Uprising]. (T. 1). Kraków. [in Polish]

Bartoszewicz, J. (1864). Co znaczyła i gdzie była Ukraina? [What does Ukraine Mean and where was it?]. Biblioteka Warszawska, 2, 1–26. [in Polish]

Butterwick-Pawlikowski, R. (2005). What is Enlightenment (oświecenie)? Some Polish Answers, 1765–1820. Central Europe, 3(1), 19–37. doi: 10.1179/147909605x44218 [in English]

Butterwick-Pawlikowski, R. (2008). Deconfessionalization? The Policy of the Polish Revolution towards Ruthenia, 1788–1792. Central Europe, 6(2), 91–121. doi: 10.1179/174582108X366063 [in English]

Coleman, A. P. (1934). Language as a Factor in Polish Nationalism. The Slavonic and East European Review, 13 (37), 155–172 [in English]

Czacki, T. (1801). O nazwisku Ukrainy i początku Kozaków [About the Name of Ukraine and the Beginning of the Cossacks]. Nowy Pamiętnik Warszawski, 4, 32–40. [in Polish]

Danyliak, P. H. (2009). Tadeush Chatskyi ta yoho rol u rozvytku osvity na Pravoberezhnii Ukraini [Tadeusz Czacki and his Role in the Development of Education in Right-bank Ukraine]. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal, (2), 51–66. [in Ukrainian].

Drach, I. Istoriia rusiv [History of the Ruthenians]. URL: http://litopys.org.ua/istrus/rusiv1.htm [in Ukrainian].

Dybiec, J. (2021). Nie tylko szablą. Nauka i kultura polska w walce o utrzymanie tożsamości narodowej 1795 – 1918 [Not just with a saber: Polish science and culture in the struggle to maintain national identity, 1795 – 1918]. Kraków. [in Polish]

Humeniuk, E. (1965). Nieznany rękopis Tadeusza Kościuszki [Unknown manuscript of Tadeusz Kościuszko]. Kwartalnik Historyczny, 4, 897–900. [in Polish]

Jezierski, S. (1952). Wybór pism [A Selection of Writings by Franciszek Saleza Jezierski]. (Z. Skwarczyńskiego ed.), Warszawa. [in Polish]

Kołłątaj, H. (1954). Listy Anonima i Prawo Polityczne Narodu Polskiego [Anonymous letters and the political law of the polish nation]. (B. Leśnodorski, H. Wereszуcka oprać.). (T. 1). Kraków. [in Polish]

Kukiel, M. (1966). Dzieje Polski porozbiorowe 1795 – 1921 [A Post-Partition History of Poland 1795 – 1921]. London. [in Polish]

Lukowski, J. (2004). Political Ideas among the Polish Nobility in the Eighteenth Century (To 1788). The Slavonic and East European Review, 82(1), 1–26. [in English]

Marczyński, W. (1820). Statystyczne, topograficzne i historyczne opisanie gubernii podolskiey z rycinami i mappami [Statistical, Topographical and Historical Description of the Podolian Province with Pictures and Maps]. (T. 2). Wilno. [in Polish]

Matlęgiewicz, T. (2011). Wokół problematyki narodu w pismach Stanisława Staszica [Around the Problems of the Nation in the Writings of Stanisław Staszic]. Studia Politicae Universitatis Silesiensis, (7), 15–39. [in Polish]

Mościcki, H. (1947). Pisma Tadeusza Kościuszki [Works of Tadeusz Kościuszko]. Warszawa. [in Polish]

Plokhy, S. (2006). Ukraine or Little Russia? Revisiting an Early Nineteenth-Century. Canadian Slavonic Papers / Revue Canadienne des Slavistes, 48(3/4), 335–353. [in English]

Próchnik, A. (1920). Demokracja Kościuszkowska [Kościuszko Democracy]. Lwów. [in Polish]

Radetskyi, N. M. (2019). Ukraintsi ta ukrainska mova v uiavlenniakh polskykh suspilno-politychnykh diiachiv Halychyny 1848 roku [The Image of the Ukrainians and Ukrainian Language among Polish Socio-political figures of Galicia in 1848]. Spheres of culture, (XX), 76–85. [in Ukrainian].

Shek Brnardić, T. (2006), The Enlightenment (Oświecenie)? Some in Eastern Europe: Between Regional Typology and Particular Microhistory. European Review of History, 13(3), 411–435. doi: 10.1080/13507480600893130. [in English]

Staszic, S. (1790). Przestrogi dla Polski z teraznieyszych politycznych Europy związkow y z praw natury wypadaiące [Warnings for Poland, Coming from the Current European Politics and Natural Laws]. URL: https://wolnelektury.pl/media/book/pdf/przestrogi-dla-polski.pdf [in Polish]

Staszic, S. (1815). O ziemorództwie Karpatów i innych gór i równin Polski [About the Origin of the Carpathians and other Mountains and Plains of Poland]. Warszaw. [in Polish]

Staszic, S. (1926). Uwagi nad życiem Jana Zamoyskiego [Remarks upon the Life of Jan Zamoyski]. (S. Czarnowski oprac.). Kraków: Nakł. Krakowskiej Spółki Wydawniczej. [in Polish]

Staszic, S. (1954). Pisma filozoficzne i społeczne [Philosophical and Social Writings]. (B. Suchodolski oprac.). (T. 1). Warszawa. [in Polish]

Święcki, T. (1861). Opis starożytnej Polski [The Description of the Ancient Poland]. (T. 1). Warszawa. [in Polish]

Tarasiuk, Ya. (2013). Doba Prosvitnytstva v Rechi Pospolytii: biloruska perspektyva [The Age of Enlightenment in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: a Belarusian perspective]. Filosofska dumka, (1), 81–89. [in Ukrainian]

Tazbir, J. Język polski a świadomość narodowa [Polish Language and National Identity]. URL: https://rjp.pan.pl/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1351. [in Polish]

Walicki, A. (1997). The Idea of Nation in the Main Currents of Political Thought of the Polish Enlightenment. In Samuel Fiszman (Ed.), Constitution and Reform in Eighteenth-Century Poland: the Constitution of 3 May 1791. URL: https://publish.iupress.indiana.edu/read/0218d762-6267-420c-893c-e01fd963f4e9/section/6684fac1-d361-48af-92c0-11a7d262eb17#ch7 [in English]

Walicki, A. (2009). Naród, nacjonalizm, patriotyzm [Nation, Nationalism, Patriotism]. (T. 1). Kraków. [in Polish]

Zashkilniak, L. & Krykun, M. (2002). Istoriia Polshchi: Vid naidavnishykh chasiv do nashykh dniv [History of Poland: From the earliest times to the present day]. Lviv: Lvivskyi natsionalnyi universytet im. I. Franka. [in Ukrainian]

Downloads

Published

2023-09-23

Issue

Section

Articles