POLICY OF TURKEY ON “THE KURDISH ISSUE” SETTLEMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COPENHAGEN CRITERIA ENFORCEMENT (THE END OF THE 20th – THE BEGINNING OF THE 21st CENTURY)

Authors

  • Oksana MEMISH PhD (History), senior lecturer of the department of archeology and special branches of historical Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University of Cherkasy, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1838-4877
  • Andii KASIAN PhD (History), senior lecturer of the department of archeology and special branches of historical Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University of Cherkasy, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8073-7138

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24919/2519-058X.28.287553

Abstract

In the article there has been analyzed the main stages of the European integration process in Turkey, the evolution of Turkey in the issue of compliance with the Copenhagen criteria, as well as the main measures taken by the Turkish government regarding the Copenhagen criteria implementation in order to obtain a full membership in the EU from the end of the 1990s to the 2000s. The purpose of the research is to analyze the attempts made by the leadership of Turkey in order to settle “the Kurdish issue” in the context of the Copenhagen criteria implementation, which became an effective alternative to the traditional force scenario to its solution. Economic and legal criteria were key in this context. Since the 1990s and until nowadays, the Turkish government has implemented a number of economic, political and social projects aimed at solving “the Kurdish issue by integrating the residents of South-Eastern Anatolia into the Turkish society successfully, as well as overcoming uneven social economic development of the Turkish regions. The methodology of the research is based on the principles of historicism, scientificity, an interdisciplinary principle, a valuable approach and the use of general scientific (analysis, synthesis and generalization) methods.

As a result of the scientific analysis carried out with involvement of numerous original sources, the authors came to the following conclusion: taking into account the experience of reforms in the 2000s – 2010s, it became obvious that in the case of continuation of Turkey’s European integration aspirations, “the Kurdish issue” could be solved only in a long term by increasing the level of well-being and education among the population of South-Eastern Anatolia, creating a developed network of health care institutions, modern infrastructure of the region, ensuring a real access of population to the work of local authorities, forming a law enforcement system that would function on the basis of the principles of a social justice and equality of all before the law.

Key words: Turkey, European Union (EU), European Economic Community (EEC), European
integration, Copenhagen criteria, “the Kurdish issue”, South-eastern Anatolia, Kurdistan Workers’
Party (PKK), South-eastern Anatolia Project (Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi, GAP).

References

Address given by Romano Prodi. (2004). Address given by Romano Prodi on Turkey’s application for accession (Brussels, 6 October 2004). URL: https://www.cvce.eu/obj/address_given_by_romano_prodi_on_turkey_s_application_for_accession_brussels_6_october_2004-en-403f5ccf-1dcf-4df4-9330-da9675df10e0.html [in English]

Al’-Azavi Khaider Adil Kadіm (2014). Yevrointehratsiynyy kurs Turets’koyi Respubliky v konteksti yiyi bezpekovoyi polityky [The European integration course of the Republic of Turkey in the context of its security policy]. Mizhnarodni vidnosyny. Seriya “Politychni nauky”, 4. URL: http://journals.iir.kiev.ua/index.php/pol_n/article/view/2594/2302. [in Ukrainian]

Chubrykova, O. O. (2013). Yevrointehratsiyna meta v kontseptsiyi suchasnoyi zovnishn’oyi polityky Turechchyny: pereosmyslennya rukhu do Yevropeys’koho Soyuzu v 50-tu richnytsyu pidpysannya Uhody pro asotsiatsiyu [The European integration goal in the concept of Turkey's foreign policy: rethinking the movement towards the European Union on the 50th anniversary of the signing of the Association Agreement]. Zovnishnya polityka i dyplomatiya: tradytsiyi, trendy, dosvid, 20, 44–51. [in Ukrainian]

European Commission. (2004). European Commission, Enlargement Newsletter. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/DOC_04_6 [in English]

Gadzhiiev, A. G. (2007). Parlamentskiye vybory v Turtsii 2007 g.: pozitsii politicheskikh partiy po probleme vstupleniya Turtsii v ES [Turkish Parliamentary Elections 2007: Positions of Political Parties on Turkey's EU Accession]. Turtsiya nakanune i posle parlamentskikh i prezidentskikh vyborov: sb. statey, 219–227. [in Russian]

Gadzhiiev, A. G. (2009). Trudnosti na puti vstupleniya Turtsii v ES [Difficulties on the path of Turkey's accession to the EU]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya, 1, 4–52. [in Russian]

Kovalenko, R. S. (2013). Torhovel’ne spivrobitnytstvo Turechchyny z Yevropeys’kym Soyuzom: Yevrointehratsiynyy kontekst [Trade cooperation of Turkey with the European Union: European integration context]. BiznesInform, 5, 28–33. [in Ukrainian]

Kudriashova, Yu. S. (2004). Kopengagenskiye kriterii ES i Turtsiya [EU Copenhagen Criteria and Türkiye]. Vostokovednyy sbornik, 6, 118–131. [in Russian]

Kudriashova, Yu. S. (2006). Kul’turno-religioznaya samobytnost’ Turtsii kak faktor, prepyatstvuyushchiy eye vstupleniyu v ES [Cultural and religious identity of Turkey as a factor preventing its accession to the EU]. Vostokovednyy sbornik, 338–350. [in Russian]

Kudriashova, Yu. S. (2010). Turtsiya i Evropeyskiy soyuz: istoriya, problemy i perspektivy vzaimodeystviya [Türkiye and the European Union: history, problems and prospects of cooperation]. Moskov: Institut Blizhnego Vostoka. [in Russian]

Kunakov, V. V. (1999). Turtsiya i ES: problemy ekonomicheskoy integratsii [European integration process]. Moskov: Institut izucheniya Izrailya i Blizhnego Vostoka. [in Russian]

Kurdish political representation. (2021). Kurdish political representation and equality in Turkey. URL: https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cdp-2021-0172/ [in English]

Mamedova, A. (2017). Protsess evropeyskoy integratsii Turtsii: osnovnyye reformy gosudarstvennogo stroya i pravovoy sistemy [The process of European integration of Turkey: the main reforms of the political system and the legal system]. Natsional’nyy yuridicheskiy zhurnal: teoriya i praktika, 203–207. [in Russian]

Mkhytarian N. I. (2005). Shlyakh Turechchyny do Yevrosoyuzu u konteksti yevrointehratsiynykh prahnen Ukrayiny [Turkey's path to the European Union in the context of Ukraine's European integration aspirations]. Stratehichna panorama, 1–2, 63–66. [in Ukrainian]

Rumford, C. (2001). Human rights and democratization in Turkey in the context of EU candidature [Human rights and democratization in Turkey in the context of EU candidature]. Journal of European Area Studies, 9(1), 93–106. [In English].

Tekdemir, O. (2019). The social construction of many Kurdishnesses: Mapping sub-identities of EU-using Kurdish politics [The social construction of many Kurdishnesses: Mapping sub-identities of EU-using Kurdish politics]. Ethnicities, 19, 876–900. [in English]

Terörün Sona Erdirilmesi. (2014). Terörün Sona Erdirilmesi Ve Toplumsal Bütünleşmenin [Ending Terrorism and Social Integration]. URL: https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2014/07/20140716-1.htm [in Turkish]

Toktas, S. & Aras, B. (2010). The EU and Minority Rights in Turkey [The EU and Minority Rights in Turkey]. Political Science Quarterly, 124(4), 697–720. [in English]

Turkey in Europe. (2009). Turkey in Europe: Breaking the Vicious Circle. URL: https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/publications/turkey-europe-breaking-vicious-circle [in English]

Volchok, B. A. (2007). Yevrointehratsiya – osnovnyy vektor suchasnoyi zovnishn’oyi polityky Turechchyny [European integration is the main vector of modern foreign policy of Turkey]. Zovnishnya polityka krayin svitu ta mizhderzhavni vidnosyny, 7, 67–72. [in Ukrainian]

Vorotniuk, M. O. (2007). Yevroatlantychna polityka Turechchyny: uroky dlya Ukrayiny [Euro-Atlantic policy of Turkey: lessons for Ukraine]. Stratehichni prioritety, 3, 172–176. [in Ukrainian]

Yermakova, H. S. (2018). Relihiynyy faktor i pytannya intehratsiyi Turechchyny v YeS: orhanizatsiyno-pravovyy i teoretyko-metodolohichnyy aspekty [The religious factor and the issue of Turkey's integration into the EU: organizational-legal and theoretical-methodological aspects]. Derzhava ta rehiony, 3, 11–15. [in Ukrainian]

Yildiz, K. (2005). The Kurds in Turkey: EU Accession and Human Rights [The Kurds in Turkey: EU Accession and Human Rights]. London: Pluto Press. [in English]

Yildiz, K. (2012). Turkey’s Kurdish Conflict: Pathways to Progress Rights [Turkey’s Kurdish Conflict: Pathways to Progress Rights]. Insight Turkey, 14, 151–174. [in English]

Yilmaz, G. & Soyaltin, D. (2014). Zooming into the Domestic in Europeanization: Promotion of Fight against Corruption and Minority Rights in Turkey [Zooming into the Domestic in Europeanization: Promotion of Fight against Corruption and Minority Rights in Turkey]. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern studies, 16, 11–29. [in English]

Downloads

Published

2023-09-23

Issue

Section

Articles