“WHAT BELONGS TO SOLDIERS, PASSES BY THEM”: ATTEMPTS TO OVERCOME CORRUPTION IN THE EARLY 19TH CENTURY

Authors

  • Anatolii SKRYPNYK доктор історичних наук, доцент, професор кафедри соціальної роботи, психології та соціокультурної діяльності імені Т. Г. Сосновської НРЗВО “Кам’янець-Подільський державний інститут”, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3812-918X
  • Alla MARCHYSHYNA PhD hab. (Phililogy), Professor, Chair of the Department of the English Language at Kamianets-Podilskiy Ivan Ohiienko National University, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0430-176X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24919/2519-058X.25.269605

Keywords:

Right-Bank Ukraine, Russian Army, military, civil, provision.

Abstract

The Purpose of the Research. The paper presents a thorough study of Russian military presence in Right-Bank Ukraine as a powerful means of political support of the autocracy in the 19th century which resulted in negative social and economic transformations. The study of legal acts and archive sources of the period suggests the understanding of Russian Emperor Alexander the First’s role concerning optimization of the system of regular troops supply introduced by Ekaterina the Empress and struggle against the officials’ malversation throughout the tsar’s overall reformative activity in the first decade of the century. The Research Methodology. The scope of relevant general scientific and specific methods was applied to complete the issued objectives. Under the overall perspective of dialectal approach, biography analysis, historical and genetic method served the tools of the research. Structural and systemic approach towards data interpretation provided unbiased treatment of documented facts and their adequate incorporation into the text of the paper. The Scientific Novelty. The paper ponders on the economic relationship between the Russian military and society. It has been the first practice to analyze the top imperial authorities’ efforts initiated by the Emperor Alexander the First to put things in order in the system of supply to the regular troops stationed in Right-Bank Ukraine and provide them with the necessities. The study proves that the process in question went hand in hand with corruption combats and malversation among officers and quartermasters. The authors ground their argument on archival documents and prove that such authoritative actions resulted in minimal success and temporary improvement of the military and civil local bureaucratic system which failed to thoroughly influence the situation. The total autocratic control over the gross, high-powered, military and bureaucratic mechanism turned it into a functional tool meant to be applied in the Russian Empire’s politics on the annexed territories. The Conclusion. The obtained data and their analysis verify the assumption that the Romanovs’ aggressive policy of the early 19th century gave rise to the potentially dangerous phenomena in the state structure which ruined its basic constituents like army and civil administration. The Russian state colonial policy meant to enrich the autocracy transformed into the robbery of the annexed territories by the Russian officials. The lack of effective state control and anachronistic serfdom constituted a heavy obstacle towards reforms of any kind.

References

Cadiot, J. (2009). Russian army, non-Russians, non-Slavs, non-Orthodox: the risky construction of a multiethnic army. Russia, USSR. The Journal of Power Institutions in Post-Soviet Societies, 10. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/pipss/3770. [in English]

Colapietro, V. (2016). The Historical Past and the Dramatic Present. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, VIII(2), 1–27. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ejpap/627. [in English]

Espositi, J. L. (1984). The Transcendence of History: Essays on the Evolution of Historical Consciousness. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press. [in English]

Hartley, J. M. (1999). A Social History of the Russian Empire 1650 – 1825. London, New York: Addison Wesley Longman. [in English]

Keep, J. L. (1985). Soldiers of the Tsar: Army and Society in Russia 1462 – 1874. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [in English]

Lennon, J. (2020). Civil-Military Relations in Russia. The Commons: Puget Sound Journal of Politics, 1 (1), 4. URL: https://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/thecommons/vol1/iss1/4. [in English]

Mathers, J. G. (1995). Corruption in the Russian Armed Forces. The World Today, 51 (8/9), 167–170. [in English]

Metternykh, K. V. (1880). Imperator Aleksandr I. Portret, pisannyj Metternihom v 1829 godu [Emperor Aleksandr I. The Portrait Pained by Metternykh in 1829]. Istoricheskij vestnik, 1 (1), 174. [in Russian]

Nikolaichuk, D. O. (2017). Kiyivske gubernske pravlinnya: organizaciya diyalnosti (kinec XVIII – pochatok XX st. [Kyiv Province Governance: functioning organization (late 18th – early 20th cent.)]. Problemy istoryi Ukrainy XIX – pochatku XX st., 5, 24–39. [in Ukrainian]

Paparone, Ch. R. & Topic, G. L. (2014). The “Clausewitz” of logistics: Henry E. Eccles. URL: https://www.army.mil/article/117963/the_clausewitz_of_logistics_henry_e_eccles. [in English]

Parrott, D. (2012). The Business of War. Military Enterprise and Military Revolution in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [in English]

Pawelczyk, M. (2018). Contemporary Challenges in Military Logistics Support. Security and Defence Quarterly, 20 (3), 85–98. [in English]

Pintner, W. M. (1987). The Imperial Russian Army: Society, Politics, Economics, and Revolution. The Russian Review, 46, 439–446. [in English]

PSZ. (1830). Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossiiskoi Imperii [Complete Collection of the Laws of the Russian Empire]. St. Petersburg: Pechatano v Tipografii II Otdieleniia Sobstvennoi Ego Imperatorskago Velichestva Kantseliarii. Series 1. [in Russian]

Rana, R. (2004). Contemporary Challenges in the Civil-Military Relationship: Complementarity or imcompatibility? IRRC (International Review of the Red Cross), September, 86 (855), 565–591. [in English]

Ratch, V. (1864). Svedeniya o grafe Aleksee Andreeveche Arakcheeve [Information about the Earl Alexei Arakcheev]. Voennyj sbornik, 1861, 5, 127. [in Russian]

Reshetchenko, D. V. (2015). Pravoberezhna Ukrayina u zabezpechenni prodovolstvom vijsk Rosijskoyi imperiyi u pershij polovini XIX st. [Right-Bank Ukraine in Supplying the Russian Empire Military Forces with Food-Stuffs in the First Half of the 19th Cent.]. Pravoberezhna Ukrayina u zabezpechenni prodovolstvom vijsk Rosijskoyi imperiyi u pershij polovini XIX st., ХХIV, 92–93. [in Ukrainian]

Rossiiskiy gosudarstvennyi vojenno-instoricheskiy arkhiv [RSMHA – Russian State Military-Historical Archives]

Schulze, G. G., Sjahrir, B. S. & Zakharov, N. (2016). Corruption in Russia. The Journal of Law and Economics, 59 (1), 135–171. [in English]

Skrypnyk, A. (2014). Uchast naselennya Pravoberezhnoyi Ukrayini v transportuvanni vijskovih vantazhiv rosijskoyi armiyi (1793 – 1860 rr.) [Participation of the Population from the Right-Bank Ukraine in Transporting of the Russian Army Military Loads in 1793 – 1860]. Naukovi praci Kam’yanec-Podilskogo nacionalnogo universitetu: Istorichni nauki, 24, 254–262. [in Ukrainian]

Skrypnyk, A. (2015). Politika kadrovoyi militarizaciyi miscevogo upravlinskogo aparatu gubernij Pravoberezhnoyi Ukrayini v 20-h – 60-h rr. XIX st. [Policy of Personnel Militarization of the Local Provincial Governing Bodies in Right-Bank Ukraine in 1820 – 1860s]. Chasopys ukrayinskoyi istorii, 32, 38–44. [in Ukrainian]

Derzhavnij arhiv Rivnenskoyi oblasti [SARR – State Archives of Rivne Region]

Summerfield, S. (2005). Cossack Hurrah: Russian Irregular Cavalry Organisation and Uniforms during the Napoleonic Wars. Ligh-on-Sea: Partizan Press. [in English]

Svod voennykh postanovleniy. (1879). Svod voennykh postanovleniy [Collection of Military Decrees] (SVP) St. Petersburg: Gosudarstvennaia Tipografiia. Series 2. Part. IV. Vol. ХІІ. Section 1. Chapter 1. Article 3. [in Russian]

Torres-Sánchez, R., Brandon, P. & Hart, M. (2018). War and Economy. Rediscovering the Eighteenth-Century Military Entrepreneur. Business History, 60(1), 4–22. [in English]

Tsentralnyi derzhavnyi istorychnyi arkhiv Ukrainy m. Kyiv [CSHAUK – Central State Historical Archives of Ukraine in Kyiv]

Downloads

Published

2022-12-29

Issue

Section

Articles