HAMLET FARM DEVELOPMENT IN THE SOUTH OF UKRAINE at the end of the XVIIIth – the first third of the XXth century

Authors

  • Hennadi VASYLCHUK PhD hab. (History), Professor, Vice-Rector for Scientific Affairs of Zaporizhzhia National University, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3023-6682
  • Oleg PRYIMAK PhD hab. (History), Docent, Professor of the Department of Social Philosophy and Management Faculty of Sociology and Management, Zaporizhzhia National University, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0896-1431

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24919/2519-058X.23.258965

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to study the hamlet form of management in the South of Ukraine at the end of the XVIIIth – the first third of the XXth century. The Methodology of the Research. It was possible to achieve the goal with the help of the use of postmodern methodology. The research is based on the principles of objectivity, multifactorialism, historicism, the implementation of which took place due to the use of historical genetics, problem chronological, narrative, retrospective, classification, historical biographical methods and content analysis. The scientific novelty is that for the first time a comprehensive study of the hamlet farm development in the South of Ukraine at the end of the XVIIIth – the first third of the XXth century has been carried out. Numerous new sources have been involved in the scientific circulation, which allows expanding the idea of the existing farm management system in the region. The criteria of the analysis have been formulated and the hamlet classification has been developed, the periodization of hamlet development has been offered. The issues of preconditions, conditions, social mechanisms, algorithms of creation and distribution of hamlets have been elucidated.

The Conclusions. The emergence and spread of hamlets had been an integral part of the settlement and economic development of southern Ukraine since the end 1880s. The upper chronological limit of their existence in the region coincided with the beginning of collectivization. For almost a century and a half in the rural areas of the south there were developed eight varieties of farmland: 1) one-yard hamlets of wealthy peasants that existed on privately owned, rented and allotted lands; 2) multi-yard hamlets of wealthy peasants and middle class peasants (on privately owned and rented lands); 3) multi-yard hamlets of wealthy peasants on allotted lands; 4) multi-yard hamlets of poor peasants on allotted lands; 5) one-yard privately owned hamlets of the Azov and Danube troops’ officers; 6) one-yard hamlets of wealthy Cossacks on the allotted lands of troops; 7) multi-yard hamlets of wealthy and middle-class Cossacks on the allotted lands of troops; 8) multi-yard hamlets of the wealthy German-speaking colonists on allotted and privately owned lands.

There wre five stages in their development in the region: the end of the XVIIIth century – 1861; in 1861 – 1906; in 1906 – 1914, in 1914 – 1921, in 1921 – 1929. During the first stage the Cossack, colonial and peasant hamlet became one of the main natural and economic forms of settlement and economic development of the region. During the inter-reform period, i. e., at the second stage, the peasantry was the main subject of the hamlets foundation. At the same time, one-yard as well as in groups and by renting and buying privately owned land, wealthy and middle-class strata spread the hamlet system of management in the region in the competition for land with the community, colonists, burghers, and merchants. There was a noticeable trend in the spread of hamlets-vyselkiv and experimental rental farms. The defining method of spreading hamlet was intra-allotment land management at the third stage. In 1906 – 1917 plot of land strips of rural communities became an arena of internal competition for land. The spread of plot of land management system became widespread at that time. Not only economically stable peasants but also indigenous peasants became owners of hamlets. During the fourth stage – during the period of World War I and the revolution – hamlet development system was regressive. Its defining features were the return of small-scale land hamlet-peasants to the communal system and the forced destruction farms of the German-speaking colonists. During the NEP years, that is at the fifth stage, there was a slight revival of the hamlet system in some southern Ukrainian territories. The destruction of hamlet system took place during collectivization.

Key words: hamlet, agriculture, land use, agrarian reform, peasantry.

References

Avgustinovich, E. (1882). Po seleniyam i koloniyam v Novorossii [In Villages and Colonies in Novorossiya]. Sankt-Petersburg, 72 p. [in Russian]

Boiko, A. V. (2005). Istoriia stepovoi Ukrainy seredyny ХVІІІ – ХІХ stolittia i yii selianska viziia [History of Steppe Ukraine in the Middle of the XVIIIth – the XIXth Centuries and its Peasant Vision]. Dzherela z istorii Pivdennoi Ukrainy. Ch. 1: Memuary ta shchodennyky (Vol. 5, Book 1, pp. 33–46). Zaporizhzhia. [in Ukrainian]

Derzhavnyi arkhiv Avtonomnoi Respubliky Krym [State Archives of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea – SAARC]

Derzhavnyi arkhiv Dnipropetrovskoi oblasti [State Archives of Dnipropetrovsk region – SADR]

Derzhavnyi arkhiv Khersonskoi oblasti [State Archives of Herson region – SAHR]

Derzhavnyi arkhiv Zaporizkoi oblasti [State Archives of Zaporozhe region – SAZR]

Hurzhii, O. I., Shevchenko, V. M. & Avramenko, A. M. (2013). Hutir [Hamlet]. Entsyklopediia istorii Ukrainy [Encyclopedia of History of Ukraine] (p. 442). Kyiv, 784 p. [in Ukrainian]

Karagodin, A. I. (1998). Istoriya Zaporozhskogo kraya (1770 – 1917) [History of Zaporozhzhie Region]. Zaporozhe: “Stat”, 285 p. [in Russian]

Loginov, A. (1906). Kratkiy ocherk zemlevladeniya i zemlepolzovaniya v Aleksandrovskom uezde [A Brief Outline of Land Ownership and Land Use in Aleksandrovsky district]. Aleksandrovsk, 84 p. [in Russian]

Malenko, L. M. (2008). Kozatski stanytsi ta khutory Pivdennoi Ukrainy v XIX stolitti [Cossack Villages and Hamlets of Southern Ukraine in the XIXth century]. Kozatska spadshchyna, 4, 112–123. [in Ukrainian]

Mykhailenko, H. & Cheremisin, O. (2020). New Ukraine vs Novorossia: Myths and Realities of Geopolitical Changes during the Second Half of the XVIIIth – at the End of the XIXth Century. Skhidnoievropeiskyi Istorychnyi Visnyk [East European Historical Bulletin], 14, 36–45. Doi: 10.24919/2519-058x.14.197177. [in English]

Otchetnye svedeniya. (1916). Otchetnye svedeniya o deyatelnosti zemleustroitelnykh komissiy na 1 yanvarya 1916 g. [Reporting Information on the Activities of Land Management Commissions on January 1, 1916]. Petrograd, 109 p. [in Russian]

Postnikov, V. Ye. (1891). Yuzhnorusskoe krestyanskoe khazyaystvo [South Russian Peasant Farm]. Moskva, ХХХІІ +392 p. [in Russian]

Pryimak, O. & Pryimak, Yu. (2021). Dmytro Stolypin’s Social Experiment Repercussions in the Agricultural Reform of 1906–1917. Skhidnoievropeiskyi Istorychnyi Visnyk [East European Historical Bulletin], 19, 96–106. Doi: 10.24919/2519-058X.19.233837. [in English]

Pryimak, O. M. (2002). Stolypinska ahrarna reforma na Pivdni Ukrainy (1906 – 1917) [Stolypin’s Agrarian Reform in the South of Ukraine (1906 – 1917)]. Zaporizhzhia: RA “Tandem-U”, 187 p. [in Ukrainian]

Pryimak, O. M. (2012). Selianstvo Pivdennoi Ukrainy: sotsialna istoriia kintsia XIX – pochatku XX stolit [The Peasantry of Southern Ukraine: Social History of the end of the XIXth – beginning of the XXth centuries]. Zaporizhzhia: Zaporizkyi natsionalnyi universytet, 458 p. [in Ukrainian]

Rosiiskyi derzhavnyi istorychnyi arkhiv [Russian State Historical Archives – RSHA]

Savchuk, T. & Vasylchuk, H. (2020). The 1920s Soviet Ukraine’s Political and Social Transformations as Reflected by Serhii Mizetsky, a Country Parson Intellectual. Skhidnoievropeiskyi Istorychnyi Visnyk [East European Historical Bulletin], 14, 156 – 165. Doi: 10.24919/2519-058x.17.218204. [in English]

Statisticheskie materialy. (1916). Statisticheskie materialy k Otchetu Krestyanskogo pozemelnogo banka za 1914 god (sedmoy god vedeniya) [Statistical Materials for the Report of the Peasant Land Bank for 1914 (seventh year)]. St. Peterburg, 392 p. [in Russian]

Statisticheskiy spravochnik. (1917). Statisticheskiy spravochnik po zemlevladeniyu i zemlepolzovaniyu Yekaterinoslavskoy gubernii [Statistical Reference Book on Land Ownership and Land Use of Yekaterinoslav Province]. Yekaterinoslav, 184 p. [in Russian]

Statistika zemlevladeniya. (1907). Statistika zemlevladeniya. 1905 god. Svod dannykh po 50 guberniyam Yevropeyskoy Rossi [Land Ownership Statistics. 1905 Collection of Data on 50 Provinces of European Russia]. St. Peterburg, 267 p. [in Russian]

Stolypin, D. A. (1876). Dva doklada v Komissiyu Moskovskogo Imperatorskogo Obshchestva selskogo khozyaystva po voprosu ob ustroystve krestyanskikh khutorov na vladelcheskikh zemlyakh [Two reports to the Commission of the Moscow Imperial Society of Agriculture on the Issue of Organizing Peasant Farms on Owner’s Lands]. Moskva: Tipografiya V. Gote, 126 p. [in Russian]

Stolypin, D. A. (1892). Ob ustroystve arendnykh khutorov na vladelcheskikh zemlyakh i krestyanskom khozyaystve voobshche [On the Arrangement of Rental Farms on the Owner’s Land and Peasant Farming in general]. Moskva: Tip-ya M. Golovina, 20 p. [in Russian]

Tsentralnyi derzhavnyi arkhiv vyshchykh orhaniv vlady ta upravlinnia Ukrainy [Central State Archive of the highest authorities and administration of Ukraine – CSAHAA of Ukraine]

Tsentralnyi derzhavnyi istorychnyi arkhiv m. Moskvy [Central State Historical Archive of Moscow – CSHAM]

Yakymenko, M. A. (1996). Stanovlennia selianskoho (fermerskoho) hospodarstva v Ukraini pislia skasuvannia kriposnoho prava (1861 – 1918) [Formation of Peasant (Farmer) Economy in Ukraine after the Abolition of Serfdom (1861 – 1918)]. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal, 2, 14–32. [in Ukrainian]

Zemleustroennye khozyaystva. (1915). Zemleustroennye khozyaystva. Svodnye dannye sploshnogo po 12 uezdam podvornogo obsledovaniya khozyaystvennykh izmeneniy v pervye gody posle zemleustroystva [Land farms. Summary data of a continuous house-to-house survey of economic changes in 12 counties in the first years after land management]. Petrograd, 138 p. [in Russian]

Downloads

Published

2022-06-27

Issue

Section

Articles