EVOLUTION MOODS OF DONETSK RESIDENTS ON THE TEMPORALLY OCCUPIED TERRITORY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24919/2519-058X.23.258962

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to characterize the mood of Donetsk residents in 2015 – 2019 on the territory where the Ukrainian authorities are temporarily not exercising their powers on the basis of the source base and historiographical work. The research methodology is based on the principles of historicism, scientificity, athour’s community, systematics, comprehensiveness, critical analysis of sources, as well as the use of general scientific (analysis, synthesis, generalization) and interdisciplinary (political science, sociology) methods. The scientific novelty of the obtained results is determined by the fact that for the first time in domestic and foreign historiography the mood of Donetsk residents on the territory of the so-called “DPR” has been elucidated, their evolution towards pro-Russian sympathies has been traced and the reasons for the latter have been described. The analysis of tendencies in socio-economic, political and socio-cultural spheres has been further developed. The Conclusions. The capture of certain areas of Donetsk by the Russian occupation forces led to their political, economic and socio-cultural alienation from Ukraine. In the temporarily occupied territories, the Kremlin has created a powerful propaganda machine and a comprehensive network of socio-political organizations in order to reformat the mass consciousness of Donetsk residents. This propaganda led to an evolution of the latter’s sentiments, which manifested itself in an increase in pro-Russian sentiments and self-identification, as the share of respondents who identified themselves as the Ukrainians or those who felt Ukrainian decreased. As for the fate of the “DPR”, the majority sought its independent or autonomous status within Ukraine or Russia.

Key words: “DPR”, armed aggression, moods, occupation, “republic”, Russia, Ukraine.

References

Aleksieieva D., Bulyk, M. & Hridina, I. (2020). Propahanda na tymchasovo okupovanykh terytoriiakh Donetskoi ta Luhanskoi oblastei: instytutsionalnyi ta orhanizatsiinyi vymir. Visnyk Mariupolskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia: Istoriia. Politolohiia, 28–29, 143–153. [in Ukrainian]

Analitychna dopovid. (2017). Analitychna dopovid do Shchorichnoho Poslannia Prezydenta Ukrainy do Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy “Pro vnutrishnie ta zovnishnie stanovyshche Ukrainy v 2017 rotsi”. Kyiv: NISD. 928 p. [in Ukrainian]

Analytycheskyi otchet “Ahentі “russkoho myra” v okkupyrovannom Donbasse”. (2020). Vostochnaia pravozashchytnaia gruppa. 48 p. [in Russian]

Bolshynstvo donchan ne odobriaiut deistvyia separatystov – opros. Liha. Novosty. URL: https://news.liga.net/politics/news/bolshinstvo_donchan_ne_odobryayut_deystviya_separatistov_opros. [in Russian]

Vasin, S. (2016). “Zalyshentsi”: nevidomyi Boskh u “DNR” [“Remnants”: unknown Bosch in “DNR”]. Dzerkalo tyzhnia, 25. URL: https://zn.ua/ukr/internal/zalishenci-nevidomiy-bosh-u-dnr-_.html. [in Ukrainian]

Viina na Donbasi. (2019). Viina na Donbasi: realii i perspektyvy vrehuliuvannia. Dopovid u ramkakh proiektu “Konflikt na Donbasi: suchasni realii i perspektyvy vrehuliuvannia” za pidtrymky MZS Niderlandiv [The war in Donbass: realities and prospects for settlement. Report within the project “Conflict in Donbass: current realities and prospects for settlement” with the support of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands]. Kyiv: Ukrainskyi tsentr ekonomichnykh i politychnykh doslidzhen imeni Oleksandra Razumkova,144 p. [in Ukrainian]

Vikhrov, M. (2019). Sotsiolohiia v okupatsii [Sociology in occupation]. Ukrainskyi tyzhden, 45 (625). URL: https://tyzhden.ua/Society/237431. [in Ukrainian]

Voina neyzbezhna? (Igor Strelkov, Aleksandr Rіbin) [War is inevitable Igor Strelkov, Alexander Ribin)]. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qh8Qyu2WrIc&t=81s. [in Russian]

Dumky ta nastroi. (2018). Dumky ta nastroi zhyteliv okupovanykh terytorii [Thoughts and moods of the inhabitants of the occupied territories]. Ukrainskyi instytut maibutnoho. URL: https://uifuture.org/analitychni-materialy/fokus-grupi-dumki-ta-nastroyi-zhiteliv-okupovanix-teritorij/. [in Ukrainian]

Lukashova, S. (2018). Butaforiia po-rosiisky. Navishcho Kremliu “vybory” na Donbasi, i chym vony zakinchylysia [Props in Russian. Why the Kremlin “elections” in the Donbass, and how they ended]. Ukrainska pravda. URL: https://www.pravda.com.ua/articles/2018/11/12/7197997/. [in Ukrainian]

Kazanskyi, D. (2015). ORDILO. Vyprobuvannia 2016-m [ORDILO. Trials 2016]. Ukrainskyi tyzhden, 51–52 (423–424), 14–16. [in Ukrainian]

Kazanskyi, D. (2019). ORDІLO: doba maroderstva [ORDILO: the age of looting]. Ukrainskyi tyzhden. URL: https://tyzhden.ua/Society/238830. [in Ukrainian]

Kazarin, P. (2017). Zneosoblenyi Donbas [Impersonal Donbas]. Ukrainska pravda. URL: https://www.pravda.com.ua/articles/2017/02/10/7135012/.[in Ukrainian]

Katrychenko, T. (2019). Cherhy i pasportni tury v Rosiiu: yak u Donetsku i Luhansku rozdaiut rosiiski dokumenty [Queues and passport tours to Russia: how Russian documents are distributed in Donetsk and Luhansk]. Ukrainska pravda. URL: https://www.pravda.com.ua/articles/2019/05/30/7216530/. [in Ukrainian]

Kononov, I. (2015). Luhanskyi syndrom yak masova anomichna reaktsiia na rozghortannia hibrydnoi viiny [Luhansk syndrome as a mass anomic reaction to the development of hybrid warfare]. Historians. URL: http://www.historians.in.ua/index.php/en/doshdzhennya/1778-inya-kononov-luhanskyy-syndrom-yak-masova-anomichna-reaktsiya-na-rozhortannya-hibrydnoyi-viyny. [in Ukrainian]

Kosienkowski, M. (2011). Proces narodowotwórczy w Naddniestrzańskiej Republice Mołdawskiej [Nation-building Process in the Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic]. Dwie dekady transformacji w Europie Środkowej i Wschodniej 1989–2009, 347–355. [in Polish]

Mokan, V. (2020). “Komsomol” ta “narodni druzhyny”: yak Kreml hotuie ahentiv vplyvu dlia poshyrennia idei “russkoho myra” v ORDLO [“Komsomol” and “People’s Troops”: how the Kremlin prepares agents of influence to spread the ideas of “Russian peace” in ORDLO]. Ukrainska pravda. URL: https://www.pravda.com.ua/columns/2020/06/3/7254316/. [in Ukrainian]

O pryznanii. (2017). O pryznanii v Rossyiskoi Federatsii dokumentov i registratsionnykh znakov transportnykh sredstv, vydannykh na territoryiakh otdelnykh raionov Donetskoi i Luhanskoi oblastei Ukrainy: Ukaz Prezydenta Rossyiskoi Federatsyy ot 18.02.2017 h. № 74 [On the recognition in the Russian Federation of documents and registration plates of vehicles issued in the territories of certain regions of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine: Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of February 18, 2017 No. 74]. URL: http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/41702. [in Russian]

Osetrova, A. & Syvets, L. (2017). Uroky istorii. Kakym vydiat svoe budushchee shkolniki spornykh territoryi [History lessons. How schoolchildren of disputed territories see their future]. Ukrainska pravda. URL: http://life.pravda.com.ua/society/2017/11/30/227714/. [in Russian]

Rzheutska, L. (2021). Rosiiska “pasportyzatsiia” Donbasu: deputaty Rady prydumaly, yak protydiiaty [Russian “certification” of Donbass: deputies of the Council have figured out how to counteract]. DW. URL: https://www.dw.com/uk/pasporty-rf-v-ordlo-deputaty-rady-prydumaly-yak-protydiiaty/a-58678217. [in Ukrainian]

Rushchenko, I. (2017). Fenomen “dvokh Donbasiv”: vektory rozvytku kolektyvnoi svidomosti naselennia riznykh chastyn Donbasu v umovakh hibrydnoi viiny [The phenomenon of “two Donbass”: vectors of development of collective consciousness of the population of different parts of Donbass in the conditions of hybrid war]. Ukrainskyi sotsiolohichnyi zhurnal, 1–2, 34–43. [in Ukrainian]

Sasse Gwendolyn. (2017). The Donbas – Two parts, or still one? URL: https://www.zois-berlin.de/publikationen/the-donbas-two-parts-or-still-one. [in English]

“Svoia” ystoryia. (2018). “Svoia” ystoryia: Kakie uchebniki pishut dlia donetskikh studentov [“Own” history: What textbooks are written for Donetsk students]. Novosti Donbassa. URL: https://novosti.dn.ua/article/7022-svoya-ystoryya-kakye-uchebnyky-pyshut-dlya-doneckykh-studentov. [in Russian]

Syzov, V. (2020). Vnesok informatsiinoho movlennia Ukrainy v protses reintehratsii Donbasu. Analitychna zapyska [The contribution of information broadcasting of Ukraine to the process of reintegration of Donbass. Analytical note]. Kyiv: Donetskyi instytut informatsii, 5 p. [in Ukrainian]

Syzov, V. (2017). Pivroku pislia zakhoplennia. Yak pratsiuie promyslovist v “DNR”. Analitychnyi zvit [Six months after the capture. How the industry works in the “DPR”. Analytical report]. Kyiv: Donetskyi instytut informatsii, 8 p. [in Ukrainian]

Yakym shliakhom. (2013). Yakym shliakhom ity Ukraini – do yakoho soiuzu pryiednuvatys? (Preferentsii naselennia za dva tyzhni do Vilniuskoho samitu) [Which way to go for Ukraine – which union to join? (Population preferences two weeks before the Vilnius summit)]. Kyivskyi mizhnarodnyi instytut sotsiolohii. URL: https://www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=ukr&cat=reports&id=204&page=2&y=2013. [in Ukrainian]

Downloads

Published

2022-06-27

Issue

Section

Articles