• Ivan PATRYLIAK PhD hab. (History), Professor of the Department of History of World’s Ukrainians, Dean of Faculty of History, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4534-4654
  • Viacheslav SHAMRAI PhD hab. (Law), Associate Professor at the Department of Constitutional Law, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8090-7523




The purpose of the research is to reconstruct the Red Army soldier’s and the Soviet administration employee’s image in the western Ukrainian regions, in 1944 – 1945, recorded in the reporting documents of the Ukrainian nationalist underground. The methodology of the research is based on the principles of historicism, systematicity, scientificity, as well as the use of general scientific (analysis, synthesis, generalization) and special historical (historical typological and historical systemic) methods. The Conclusions. Taking everything into consideration, it should be emphasized that the OUN underground reporting documentation of 1944 – 1945 provided quite rich material for the reconstruction of the image of the Soviet soldiers and administrators, who returned to the western region during the last years of World War II. First of all, it should be mentioned that the image of the Red Army soldier was quite colourful and controversial. The reporters always made a clear division concerning the front lines and the rear units. The front lines soldiers, as a rule, had better weapons and uniforms, but for the most part (except in Lviv) there was a shortage of food, which made them loot. The front lines soldiers were also characterized as fairly brave warriors with clear traits of fatalism (“careless attitude to death”) and war fatigue (the desire to end hostilities as soon as possible and return home). It should be emphasized that the level of discipline, appearance, moral degradation, demotivation, and behavior of the units and subdivisions of the “Second Front Echelon” terrified the local population, who was the main informants of the OUN reports. Due to this, the Red Army soldier appeared in the reports of the underground, mostly as a ragged, always hungry and drunk robber and rapist, who, apparently, was, in general, correlating with the general state of the affairs. Their nationality and criticism of the Bolshevik government were of great importance to the formation of the underground’s opinion of the Red Army. According to the OUN documents, which demonstrated a sympathetic attitude towards the Ukrainian soldiers and other “nationalists” and depicted a cooler attitude towards the Russian and the Jewish origin Red Army soldiers. The Ukrainian soldiers were seen as potential allies in the struggle against Bolshevism, the Russian and the Jewish soldiers were considered to be the mainstay of the regime. However, it is important to note that the role of “support” of the Soviet power was given to the Russians increasingly rather than the Jews, as it was still believed in the OUN in 1939 – 1941. At the same time, the image of the Soviet administration in the OUN reports was less differentiated. It was mostly negative. The authorities were characterized as uneducated and primitive people without critical thinking, densely indoctrinated by the official ideology, prone to abuse, corruption and profit, hated by the rest of society.

Key words: the Red Army, the Soviet administration, the OUN underground, reporting documents, front line.



Ghrycjuk, V., Lysenko, O., Pyljavec, R. & Sydorov, S. (2015). Strateghichni ta frontovi operaciji na terytoriji Ukrajiny u 1943 – 1944 rokakh [Strategic and frontline operations on the territory of Ukraine in 1943 ‒ 1944]. Kyiv. Nacionaljnyj universytet oborony Ukrajiny imeni Ivana Chernjakhovsjkogho, Instytut istoriji Ukrajiny NAN Ukrajiny, 508 p. [in Ukrainian]

Haluzevyi derzhavnyi arkhiv Sluzhby bezpeky Ukrainy [Sectoral State Archive of the Security Service of Ukraine ‒ SSA SSU]

Ilnyckyi, V. (2016). Karpatsjkyj kraj OUN v ukrajinsjkomu vyzvoljnomu rusi (1945 – 1954) [The Carpathian Region of the OUN in the Ukrainian liberation movement (1945 ‒ 1954)]. Droghobych: Posvit, 696 p. [in Ukrainian].

Kahanov, Y. (2019). Vision of a “New Soviet man” in European and American historiography of the second half of the XX century. Skhidnoievropeiskyi istorychnyi visnyk ‒ East European Historical Bulletin, 11, 202–214. Doi: https://doi.org/10.24919/2519-058x.11.170713 [in English]

Kentij, A. (1999). Ukrajinsjka povstansjka armija v 1944 – 1945 rr. [Ukrainian insurgent army in 1944 ‒ 1945]. Kyiv. Instytutistoriji Ukrajiny NAN Ukrajiny, 220 p. [in Ukrainian]

Kuzina, K. (2021). Obraz spivrobitnyka VNK-ODPU-NKVS u rosijskomu emigrantskomu dyskursi 1920 ‒ 1930-kh rr. [The image of an employee of the VNK-ODPU-NKVD in the Russian emigrant discourse of the 1920s and 1930s.]. Ukrajinskyj istorychnyj jurnal, 5, 113‒130. Doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/uhj2021.05.113 [in Ukrainian]

Kyrychuk, Yu. (2000). Narysy z istorijiukrajinsjkoghonacionaljno-vyzvoljnoghorukhu 40 ‒ 50-kh rokiv XX stolittja [Essays on the history of the Ukrainian national liberation movement of the 40-50s of the XXth century]. Ljviv: LDU imeni Ivan Franka, 304 p. [in Ukrainian].

Kyrychuk, Yu. (2003). Ukrajinsjkyj nacionaljnyj rukh 40 ‒ 50-kh rokiv XX stolittja: ideologhija ta praktyka [Ukrainian National Movement of the 1940s and 1950s: ideology and practice]. Lviv: Dobra sprava, 464 p. [in Ukrainian].

Lesjkiv, M. (2008). Radjansjkyj rezhym u zakhidnykh oblastjakh Ukrajiny (1944 – 1953) [Soviet regime in the western regions of Ukraine (1944 ‒ 1953)]. (Extended abstract of Candidate’s thesis). Lviv, 18 p. [in Ukrainian]

Lysenko, O. & Pyliavets, R. (2019). Bytva za Dnipro u Druhij Ssvitovij vijni: sproba novoji konceptualnoji viziji [The Battle of the Dnieper in World War II: An Attempt at a New Conceptual Vision]. Ukrajinskyj istorychnyj jurnal, 4, 88‒117. [in Ukrainian]

Patryljak, I. (2012). “Vstanj i borysj! Slukhaj i vir…”: ukrajinsjke nacionalistychne pidpillja ta povstansjkyj rukh (1939 – 1960) [“Get up and fight! Listen and believe…”: Ukrainian Nationalist Underground and Insurgent Movement (1939 ‒ 1960)]. Ljviv: Chasopys, 592 p. [in Ukrainian]

Patryljak, I. (2020). Vyzvoljna borotjba OUN i UPA (1939 – 1960) [The liberation struggle of the OUN and the UPA (1939 ‒ 1960)]. Kyiv: ADEF-Ukrajina, 712 p. [in Ukrainian]

Rusnachenko, A. (2002). Narod zburenyj: Nacionaljno-vyzvoljnyj rukh v Ukrajini i nacionaljni rukhy oporu v Bilorusiji, Lytvi, Latviji, Estoniji u 1940 ‒ 50-kh rokakh [The people are upset: the National Liberation Movement in Ukraine and the national resistance movements in Belarus, Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia in the 1940s and 1950s]. Kyiv: Puljsary, 519 p. [in Ukrainian]

Stasjuk, O. (2018). Osoblyvosti formuvannja predstavnycjkoji ghilky vlady u Zakhidnoukrajinsjkykh oblastjakh URSR u povojennyj period [Features of the formation of the representative branch of government in the Western regions of the USSR in the postwar period]. Skhidnoievropeiskyi istorychnyi visnyk ‒ East European Historical Bulletin, 7, 151–159. Doi: https://doi.org/10.24919/2519-058x.2664-2735.eehb.7.2018/ [in Ukrainian]

Stasjuk, O. (2020). Roli miscevykh rad u politychnykh ta ekonomichnykh transformacijakh zakhidnykh oblastej URSR povojennogho periodu [The role of local councils in the political and economic transformations of the western regions of the USSR in the postwar period]. Ukrajinsjkyj istorychnyj zhurnal, 4, 97‒109. Doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/uhj2020.04.097 [in Ukrainian]

Vovk, O. & Kokin, S. (Comps.) (2006). Litopys UPA. Nova serija, tom. 8. Volynj, Polissja, Podillja: UPA ta Zapillja 1944 – 1946. Dokumenty i materialy [Chronicle of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army. New series, volume. 8. Volyn, Polissya, Podillya: UPA and Zapillya 1944 ‒ 1946. Documents and materials]. Kyiv ‒ Toronto, 1448 p. [in Ukrainian]