A VISION OF THE ESSENCE OF THE TOTALITARIANISM TRANSFORMATION AT THE STAGE OF GLOBALIZATION IN MODERN ENGLISH HISTORIOGRAPHY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24919/2519-058X.22.253734

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to clarify the economic and ideological and political foundations of the transformation of the concept of “totalitarianism” at the present stage. The methodological basis of the research is premised on the principles of systematics, objectivity, comprehensiveness and historicism. The investigation was carried out by applying the methods of induction and deduction, analysis and synthesis, abstraction, as well as comparative, problem-historical and retrospective methods. The novelty of the study is based on the approaches common in the English-language segment of the scientific literature on globalization. A comprehensive comparison of this concept with the concept of the nation-state was made, and the potential for the development of new forms of total control of political actors over society was considered. The Conclusions. The study makes it quite obvious that globalization is a process of formation, development and transformation of a system of unilateral advantages in the context of permanent capitalist competition and selective modernization. At present, these benefits are increasingly concentrated in the financial and information sector. The development of electronic means of control and communication, on the one hand, repeatedly strengthens the official ability of the world’s leading nations to monitor the natural and mechanical movement of the population. On the other hand, it contributes to the limitation of the state powers by this function and accelerates the international money circulation outside the governmental competences, which especially weakens the position of political regimes in developing countries. In parallel with the degradation of national sovereignty, supranational corporate and sub-national ethnic clusters are rising. At the same time, together with the real power, the potential ability to create radical totalitarian forms flows here from the national level. In other words, the traditional notion of individual totalitarian and institutional democratic governance is contrasted with the concept of sub regional, national and supranational control.

Key words: totalitarianism, globalization, nation-state, “failed state”, sovereignty, transnational corporations, competition, migration, technological progress.

References

Al-Rohan, R.F. Nayef & Stoutmann, G. (2006). Definitions of the Globalization: A Comprehensive Overview and a Proposed Definition. URL: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download? Doi: https://doi.org/10.1.1.472.4772&rep=rep1&type=pdf. [in English]

Barber, L. (2016). Globalization 2.0 – an Optimistic Outlook. Financial Times, January 14. URL: https://www.ft.com/content/3dffc316-bad3-11e5-b151-8e15c9a029fb [in English]

BBC World Service Poll. (2008). Widespread Unease about Economy and Globalization: Global Poll. URL: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/07_02_08worldservicepoll.pdf [in English]

Bresser-Pereira, L. K. (2008). Globalization, Nation State and Catching up. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 28(112), 557‒576. URL: https://www.scielo.br/j/rep/a/dwRTqshRwh4v7KdB5cwFT7k/?lang=en Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31572008000400002 [in English]

Deruder, B. (2003). Viewing the Capitalist World-System Through (inter-)city Lenses: Rationale, Methodology and First Results. Belgeo, 3, 269‒288. URL: https://journals.openedition.org/belgeo/16717?lang=en Doi: https://doi.org/10.4000/belgeo.16717 [in English]

Ferguson, N. (2018). Tsyvilizatsiia. Yak Zahid Stav Uspishnym [Civilization. The West and the Rest]. Kyiv: “Nash Format”, 488 p. [in Ukrainian]

Ford, M. (2016). Pryshestia Robotive. Tekhnika i Zahroza Maibutnoho Bezrobittia [Rise of the Robots. Technology and Threat of a Jobless Future]. Kyiv: “Nash Format”, 400 p. [in Ukraine]

Fotopoulos, T. (2001). Globalization, the Reformist Left and Anti-Globalization “Movement”. Democracy & Nature, 7(2), 233‒280. URL: https://www.staff.ncl.ac.uk/david.harvey/AEF806/Fotopoulos.pdf [in English]

Hanspeter, K., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornshcier, S. & Frey, T. (2006). Globalization and the Transformation of the National Political Space: Six European Countries Compared. European Journal of Political Research, 45, 921‒956. URL: https://ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00644.x Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00644.x [in English]

Hosseni, S.A. Hamed. (2015). Globalization and the Nation-State. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276348393_Globalization_and_the_Nation-State Doi: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.5028.7528 [in English]

Inglehart, R. (2001). Modernization, Sociological Theories of. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 9965‒9971. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0080430767019215 [in English]

James, K. & Weidemier, M. (2008). Trade and Empire. Cambridge. URL: https://www.nber.org/papers/w13765.pdf [in English]

James, P. (2005). Arguing Globalization: Proposition towards an Investigation of Global Formation. Globalization, 2(2), 193‒209. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233428640_Arguing_globalizations_Propositions_towards_an_investigation_of_global_formation Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14747730500202206 [in English]

James, P. (2006). Globalism, Nationalism, Tribalism: Bringing Theory Back In. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: “Sage Publication”. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270900449_Globalism_Nationalism_Tribalism_Bringing_Theory_Back_In Doi: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446217603 [in English]

James, P. (2014). Faces of Globalization and the Borders of States: From Asylums to Citizens. Citizenship Studies, 18(2), 208‒223. URL: https://www.academia.edu/7773440 Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2014.886440 [in English]

Karatasli, S. S. (2016). The Capitalist World-economy in the Longue Duree: Changing Modes of the Global Distribution of Wealth, 1500-2008. Sociology of Development forthcoming, (2). URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308764748_The_Capitalist_World-economy_in_the_Longue_Duree_Changing_Modes_of_the_Global_Distribution_of_Wealth_1500-2008 Doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/sod.2017.3.2.163 [in English]

Krishman, A. (2016). War as Business. Technological Change and Military Service Contracting. London and New-York: “Routledge”, 205 p. URL: https://books.google.com.ua/books?id=1ymrCwAAQBAJ&pg=PAPA157&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false [in English]

Liodakis G. (2005). The New stage of Capitalist of Capitalist Development and the Prospect of Globalization. Science & Society, 69(3), 341‒366. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40404263 [in English]

O’Rourke, Kevin H., Leandro Prados de la Escosura, L. P. & Daudin, G. (2008). Trade and Empire, 1700 ‒ 1870. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/4849529_Trade_and_Empire_1700-1870 [in English]

Rodrik, D. (2019). Globalization’s Wrong Turn. And How it Hurts. Foreign Affairs, 98(4), 26‒33. URL: https://drodrik.scholar.harvard.edu/files/dani-rodrik/files/globalizations_wrong_turn.pdf [in English]

Seguino, S. & Crown, C. (2006). Gender Equity and Globalization: Macroeconomic Policy for Developing Countries. Journal of International Development, 18(8), 1080‒10104. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jid.1295 Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1295 [in English]

Steger, M. B. & James, P. (2013). Levels of Subjective Globalization: Ideologies, Imaginaries, Ontologies. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 12(1‒2), 17‒40. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269947119_Levels_of_Subjective_Globalization_Ideologies_Imaginaries_Ontologies Doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/15691497-12341240 [in English]

Thomas, G.M. (2007) Globalization: The Major Players. The Blackwell Companion to Globalization (George Ritzer, Ed.), 84‒102. URL: file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/24003496-553431-1-10-20210930.pdf [in English]

Wallerstein, I. (2002). The Capitalist World-Economy. Cambridge University Press. URL: http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/samples/cam034/78002955.pdf [in English]

Wallerstein, I. (2004). The Modern World-System as a Capitalist World-Economy. URL: https://cdn.vanderbilt.edu/vu-my/wp-content/uploads/sites/1414/2014/04/14122105/Session_03_Wallerstein.pdf [in English]

Wolf, M. (2001). Will the Nation-State survive Globalization. Foreign Affairs, 80/1, 178‒190. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20050051?origin=crossref Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/20050051 [in English]

Wolf, M. (2014). Shaping Globalization. Finance & Development, 51(3), 22‒55. URL: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2014/09/pdf/wolf.pdf 10.1163/15691497-12341240 [in English]

Downloads

Published

2022-03-27

How to Cite

MOROZOV, A. ., & HRON, . V. . (2022). A VISION OF THE ESSENCE OF THE TOTALITARIANISM TRANSFORMATION AT THE STAGE OF GLOBALIZATION IN MODERN ENGLISH HISTORIOGRAPHY. EAST EUROPEAN HISTORICAL BULLETIN, (22), 240–250. https://doi.org/10.24919/2519-058X.22.253734

Issue

Section

Articles