THE PROCEDURAL ISSUES OF THE POCHAIV MONASTERY TRANSFER TO THE GREEK RUSSIAN CLERGY PROPERTY IN THE SECOND THIRD OF THE XIXTH CENTURY

Authors

  • Ella BYSTRYTSKA PhD hab. (History), Professor, Head of the Department of World History and Religious, Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6844-691X
  • Lesia KOSTIUK PhD (History), Associate Professor of the Department of World History and Religious, Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4608-6906

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24919/2519-058X.21.246905

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to elucidate the mechanism of the Pochayiv Monastery transfer to the structure of the Russian Orthodox Church in 1831, the range of conflict issues between the Russian and Greek Uniate clergy and the government officials’ participation in the above-mentioned process. The research methodology is based on the principles of objectivity and systematicity. The following general scientific methods have been used: analysis, synthesis, generalization, induction and deduction, and special methods of historical cognition – historical genetic and comparative in order to solve the set tasks. The methods of classification and critique of sources have been used at the stage of archival material selection. The scientific novelty is that for the first time in Ukrainian historiography numerous unknown archival materials were involved in the scientific use, which made it possible to clarify the circumstances of the transfer of the Pochayiv Monastery to the Russian Orthodox Church. The Conclusions. According to the Emperor’s Decree, issued in 1831, a set of measures was developed by the Main Department of Spiritual Affairs of Foreign Religions, and orders of the Ministry of Internal Affairs in order to include the Pochayiv Monastery in the Greek Russian Church, which also proved the importance in the government’s intention to strengthen the Orthodoxy in the western part of the Empire. The above-mentioned documents laid down diverse measures, which were taken to ensure the transfer of the monastery from the Basilians to the Orthodox. In addition, the government officials participation in the Commission work and the deliberate removal of the Greek Uniates from its membership indicated the political motivation of the act. Ignoring the powers of the Greek Uniates Collegium, the superior treatment of its representatives made it possible to accuse the Basilians of negligent document management and concealment of property. Hence, the procedure for the transfer of the Pochayiv monastery was violated by the current authorities, which clearly outlined the direction of the Tsar’s ethnic confessional policy, which was aimed at eliminating opposition denominations in the Russian Empire, including the Greek Uniate Church.

Keywords: the Pochayiv Monastery, the Pochayiv Lavra, the Greek Uniate Church, the Greek Russian Church, Uniates, clergy, the Russian Orthodox Church.

References

Bystrytska, E. V. (2020). Pravoslavne oblashtuvannia Pochaivskoi lavry u druhii tretyni XIX st. [Orthodox Arrangements of the Pochayiv Lavra in the Second Third of the XIXth century]. Ukrainske relihiieznavstvo – Ukrainian Religious Studies, 92, 13–41. doi : https://doi.org/10.32420/2020.92.2149 [in Ukrainian]

Bystrytska, E. & Volik, N. (2021). Integration of the Pochaiv Lavra into the Structure of the Russian Orthodox Church between 1830s and 1860s. Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe, 41(6). URL: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol41/iss6/ [in English]

Bochkovska, V. H. (2008). Pochaivskyi dukhovnyi oseredok v istorii ta kulturi ukrainskoho narodu [Pochaiv Spiritual Center in the History and Culture of the Ukrainian People]. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. T. H. Shevchenka. Seriia: ukrainoznavstvo – Bulletin of the Kyiv National University. TG Shevchenko. Series: Ukrainian Studies,13, 21–25. [in Ukrainian]

Buravskyi, O. (2016). Konfesiina polityka rosiiskoho samoderzhavstva na Pravoberezhnii Ukraini ta Bilorusi (kinets XVIII – pochatok ХІХ st.) [Confessional Policy of the Russian Autocracy in Right Bank Ukraine and Belarus (the end of the XVIIIth – the beginning of the XIXth centuries)]. Naukovi zapysky Ternopilskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni Volodymyra Hnatiuka. Seriia: Istoriia. – Scientific notes of Ternopil National Pedagogical University named after Volodymyr Hnatyuk. Series: History, 1(2), 13–17. [in Ukrainian]

Derzhavnyi arkhiv Ternopilskoi oblasti [SATR – State Archives of Ternopil region]

Dudar, V. L. (2008). Hromadsko-politychnyi ta kulturnyi vplyv Pochaivskoho monastyria na naselennia Volyni (XIX – pochatok XX st.) [Socio-political and Cultural Influence of the Pochaiv Monastery on the Population of Volyn (the XIXth – the beginning of the XXth centuries)]. (Extended abstract of Candidate’s thesis). Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi, 20 p. [in Ukrainian]

Zhyliuk, S. I. (2010). Relihiina polityka tsaryzmu na Volyni (1793 – 1917 rr.). [Religious Policy of Tsarism in Volhynia (1793 – 1917)]. Ostroh: Vyd-vo NaUOA, 228 p. [in Ukrainian]

Isaievych, Ya. (2002). Ukrainske knyhovydannia: vytoky, rozvytok, problemy. [Ukrainian Book Publishing: Origins, Development, Problems]. Lviv: Instytut ukrainoznavstva im. I. Krypiakevycha NAN Ukrainy, 520 p. [in Ukrainian]

Karlina, O. (2013). Represii shchodo vasylian na Volyni pislia Lystopadovoho povstannia 1830 roku ta “styrannia pamiati” pro nykh [Repressions against the Basilians in Volhynia after the November Uprising of 1830 and “Erasing the Memory” of them]. Natsionalna ta istorychna pamiat: Zb. nauk. prats. Kyiv: PNVTs “Priorytety”, (6), 69–76. [in Ukrainian]

Klymov, V. V. (2008). Ukrainski pravoslavni monastyri ta chernetstvo: pozytsiia v natsionalnii istorii [Ukrainian Orthodox Monasteries and Monasticism: a position in national history]. Kyiv: Instytut filosofii NAN Ukrainy, 883 p. [in Ukrainian]

Martyniv, Yu. I. (2008). Pravove stanovyshche ta finansovo-hospodarska diialnist Pochaivskoi lavry u 1831 – 1914 rr.) [Legal Status, Financial and Economic Activity of the Pochayiv Lavra during the period of 1831 – 1914)] (Extended abstract of Candidate’s thesis). Ternopil, 18 p. [in Ukrainian]

Stokolos, N. H. (2003). Konfesiino-etnichni transformatsii v Ukraini (ХІХ – persha polovyna ХХ st.) [Confessional and Ethnic Transformations in Ukraine (the XIXth – the first half of the XXth century)]. Rivne: RIS KSU-PPF “Lista–M”, 480 p. [in Ukrainian]

Sheretiuk, R. M. (2012). Hreko-Uniatska Tserkva v konteksti etnokonfesiinoi polityky Rosiiskoi imperii na Pravoberezhnii Ukraini (kinets XVIII – XIX st. [The Greek Uniate Church in the Context of the Ethno-confessional Policy of the Russian Empire on the Right Bank of Ukraine (the End of the XVIIIth – the Beginning of the XIXth centuries)]. Rivne: Volynski oberehy, 432 p.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-24

Issue

Section

Articles