THE CONCEPT “RUIN”: MODERN HISTORIOGRAPHICAL DISCOURSE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24919/2519-058X.20.240044Abstract
The purpose of the researchis to study the modern historiographical discourse related to the scientific circulation of the concept “Ruin” in the context of conceptualizing the history of the Hetmanate. The research methodology is based on the methods’ symbiosis usage: comparative studies, contextual analysis, convergence from the abstract to the concrete and vice versa. The scientific novelty of the article is that for the first time the specifics of the approaches implemented by modern researchers to the use of the concept of “Ruin” for the interpretation of early modern Ukrainian history have been analyzedin historiography. The essence of the discussion concerning theconcept’smarking feasibility of a special period in the second half of the XVIIth century has been investigatedand its echo in further conceptualizations. The Conclusions. Taking into consideration that the modern scientific discourse on the concept “Ruin” reflects the key tendencies in understanding the history of early modern Ukrainian statehood.The issue reached the point of discussion concerning the grounds for using the conceptat the beginning of the XXIst century for the first time in historiography, while in the previous tradition it was used as undiscussed issue. Consequently,the discussion was translated into the plane of elucidating the image of the epoch, which forms the concept not only in scientific interpretive models, but also in the historical memory of the public. The comparative approach and typology of the Ukrainian version against the European background wereused, which provided the brand new opportunities for improving the terminological apparatus related to the eraconceptualization and marking. Furthermore, the substantive discussion between T. Chukhlib, the Ukrainian historian and T. Tairova-Yakovleva, the Russian researcher became the controversy. As a result, theabove-mentioned discussion triggered a smooth refusalof the concept “Ruin” usage in historiography, especially noticeable in Ukraine.
Key words: Ukraine, Ruin, interpretation, conceptual apparatus, scientific discourse.
References
Brekhunenko, V. (2014). Skhidna brama Yevropy.Kozatska Ukraina seredyny XVII – XVIII st. [Eastern Gate of Europe.Cossack Ukraine in the Middle of the XVIIth – the XVIIIth Centuries] Kyiv: Tempora, 504 р. [in Ukrainian]
Horobets, V. & Chukhlib, T. (1999). Istoriia ukrainskoi Ruiny ochyma rosiiskoho istoryka [History of the Ukrainian Ruins through the Eyes of the Russian Historian]. Naukovi zapysky NAUKMA – Scientific notes of NAUKMA. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi dim “Kyievo-Mohylianska Akademiia”, 14, 118–123. [in Ukrainian]
Horobets, Viktor (1999). Nemaie proroka u svoii vitchyzni. A v chuzhii? (Istoriia ukrainskoi Ruiny v interpretatsii rosiiskoi doslidnytsi) [There is no Prophet in his Homeland. And in someone else’s?(History of the Ukrainian Ruin in the interpretation of the Russian researcher)]. Ukrainskyi humanitarnyi ohliad, 2, 46–65. [in Ukrainian]
Horobets, V. (2001). Platon meni druh. I tse naidorozhche?... [Plato is my friend. And this is the most expensive? ...]. Ukrainskyi humanitarnyi ohliad, 5, 217–221). [in Ukrainian]
Kasianov, H. & Tolochko, O. (2012). Natsionalni istorii ta suchasna istoriohrafiia. Vyklyky y nebezpeky pry napysanni novoi istorii Ukrainy [National Histories and Modern Historiography. Challenges and Dangers in Writing a New History of Ukraine]. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal, 6, 4–24. [in Ukrainian]
Kossarzhetskyi, K. (2006). Dzherela arkhivu Radzyviliv (AHAD) pro stosunky kniazia Bohuslava Radzyvila z kozatskoiu Ukrainoiu v 1655 – 1669 rokakh [The sources of the Radziwills’ Archive (AGAD) on the relations of Prince Boguslaw Radziwill with Cossack Ukraine in 1655 – 1669]. Ukraina v Tsentralno-Skhidnii Yevropi (z naidavnishykh chasiv do kintsia XVIII st. – Ukraine in the Central and Eastern Europe (from ancient times to the end of the 18th century), 6, 548–570. [in Ukrainian]
Kohut, Z. (1996). Rosiiskyi tsentralizm i ukrainska avtonomiia. Likvidatsiia Hetmanshchyny 1760 – 1830 [The Russian Centralism and Ukrainian Autonomy. Liquidation of the Hetmanate in 1760 – 1830]. Kyiv: Osnovy, 317 p. [in Ukrainian]
Maslak, V. (2014). Rannomoderna ukrainska derzhavnist ochyma suchasnykh polskykh ta rosiiskykh istorykiv [The Early Modern Ukrainian Statehood through the Eyes of Modern Polish and Russian Historians]. Kamianets-Podilskyi, 354 s. [in Ukrainian]
Mytsyk Yu. A. (1990). Aktualni pytannia doslidzhennia istorii ukrainskoho kozatstva. Ukrainske kozatstvo: suchasnyi stan ta perspektyvy doslidzhennia problemy (Materialy “kruhloho stolu”) [Current Issues of Research of the History of the Ukrainian Cossacks. Ukrainian Cossacks: current state and prospects of research of the problem (Materials of the “round table”)]. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal, 12, 24–26. [in Ukrainian]
Mytsyk Yu. A., Bazhan O. H. & Vlasov V. S. (2010). Istoriia Ukrainy [History of Ukraine.Tutorial]. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi dim “Kyievo-Mohylianska akademiia”, 594 p. [in Ukrainian]
Ohloblyn, O. (1928). Do istorii Ruiny [On the History of the Ruin]. Zapysky istoryko-filolohichnoho viddilu VUAN, XVI, 196–204. [in Ukrainian]
Ohloblyn, O. (2001). Ivan Mazepa ta yoho doba [Ivan Mazepa and his time.]. Druhe dopovnene vydannia. Niu-York; Kyiv; Lviv; Paryzh; Toronto, 2001, 464 p. [in Ukrainian]
Plokhii, S. (2016). Brama Yevropy. Istoriia Ukrainy vid skifskykh voien do nezalezhnosti [The Gate of Europe. History of Ukraine from the Scythian Wars to Independence]. Kharkiv: Klub simeinoho dozvillia, 496 p. [in Ukrainian]
Smolii, V. A. (ed.) (1997). Malyi slovnyk istorii Ukrainy [A Consize Dictionary of the History of Ukraine]. Kyiv: Lybid, 464 p. [in Ukrainian]
Smolii, V. & Stepankov, V. (1993). Pravoberezhna Ukraina u druhii polovyni XVII– XVIII st: problema derzhavotvorennia [The Right-bank Ukraine in the Second Half of the XVIIth – XVIIIth centuries: the problem of state formation]. Kyiv, 72 p. [in Ukrainian]
Smolii, V. & Stepankov, V. (2009). Ukrainska natsionalna revoliutsiia XVII st. (1648 – 1676 rr.) [The Ukrainian National Revolution of the XVIIth century (1648 – 1676)]. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi dim “Kyievo-Mohylianska Akademiia”, 447 p. [in Ukrainian]
Smolii, V. A. (ed.) (2018). Ukrainskyi Hetmanat: narysy istorii natsionalnoho derzhavotvorennia XVII – XVIII st. u 2-kh kn [The Ukrainian Hetmanate: essays on the history of national state formation of the XVII – XVIII centuries in 2 books]. Kyiv: Instytut istorii Ukrainy NANU, Book 1, 610 p. [inUkrainian]
Sokyrko, O. (2009). Triumf v chas Ruiny. Konotopska bytva 1659 roku [Triumph during the Ruin. The Battle of Konotop in 1659]. Kyiv: Tempora, 70 p. [in Ukrainian]
Stepankov, V. (2003). 1648 rik: pochatok Ukrainskoi revoliutsii chy «domovoi viiny» v Rechi Pospolytii? [1648 year: the beginning of the Ukrainian revolution or the «house war» in Rich Pospolyta? Smoliy, VA (ed.),]. Ukraina v Tsentralno-Skhidnii Yevropi (vid naidavnishykh chasiv do kintsia XVIII st. – Ukraine in the Central and Eastern Europe (from ancient times to the end of the XVIII century, 3, 369–414. [inUkrainian]
Stepankov, V. & Chukhlib, T. (1994). Tetiana Yakovlieva pro pochatok Ruiny [Tetyana Yakovleva about the Beginning of the Ruin]. In Dashkevych, Ya. (ed.) Ukraina v mynulomu [Dashkevych, Ya. (Ed.) Ukraine in the Past]. (Vol. VI, pp. 184– 192). Lviv. [in Ukrainian]
Chukhlib, T. (2004). “Ruina” Hetmanshchyny chy borotba za utverdzhennia Ukrainskoi kozatskoi derzhavy (sproba zapochatkuvaty dyskusiiu shchodo odnoho istorychnoho terminu) [The “Ruin” of the Hetmanate or the Struggle for the Establishment of the Ukrainian Cossack State (An Attempt to Initiate a Discussion of a Historical Term). Ukraina v Tsentralno-Skhidnii Yevropi (vid naidavnishykh chasiv do kintsia XVIII st. – Ukraine in the Central and Eastern Europe (from ancient times to the end of the XVIII century, 4, 474–502. [in Ukrainian]
Yakovenko, N. (2005). Narys istorii serednovichnoi ta rannomodernoi Ukrainy [Essay on the History of Medieval and Early Modern Ukraine]. Vydannia druhe, pereroblene ta rozshyrene. Kyiv: Krytyka, 584 p. [inUkrainian]
Yakovleva, T. (1998). Hetmanshchyna v druhii polovyni 50-kh rr. XVII stolittia Prychyny i pochatok Ruiny [Hetmanate in the Second Half of the 50s of the XVIIth century]. Kyiv: Osnovy, 447 p. [in Ukrainian]
Yakovleva, T. (2003). Ruina Hetmanshchyny. Vid Pereiaslavskoi rady-2 do Andrusivskoi uhody (1659 – 1667 rr.) [Ruin of the Hetmanate.From the Pereyaslav Council-2 to the Andrusivska Agreement (1659 – 1667)]. Kyiv: Osnovy, 644 p. [in Ukrainian]
Yakovleva, T. (2005). Ukrayna v XVII veke: Ruyna, revoliutsyia [Ukraine in the XVIIth Century: Ruin, Revolution]. Ukraina v Tsentralno-Skhidnii Yevropi (vid naidavnishykh chasiv do kintsia XVIII st. – Ukraine in the Central and Eastern Europe (from ancient times to the end of the XVIII century, 5, 667– 672. [in Russian]
Drozdowski, M. (2011). Jan III Sobieski wobec Ukrainy [Jan III Sobieski and Ukraine]. In Chynczewska-Hennel, Tereza (ed.) Odsiecz wiedeńska. (pp.75–86). Warszawa: Wilanów. [in Polish]
Gierowski, J. A. (2004). Rzeczpospolita w dobie złotej wolności (1648 – 1763) [Republic in the Era of Golden Liberties 1648 – 1763]. In Gierowski, J. A. (ed.) Wielka Historia Polski. Kraków: Fogra, 5, 414 p. [in Polish]
Kaczmarczyk, J. (2007). Rzeczpospolita Trojga Narodów. Mit czy rzeczywistość. Ugoda hadziacka – teoria i praktyka [Republic of three nations. Myth or reality. Effective agreement – theory and practice]. Kraków: UJ, 186 p. [in Polish]
Kroll, P. (2004). Bitwa pod Konotopem (8 lipca 1659) – przyczynek do dziejów wojskowości kozackiej [The Battle of Konotop (July 8, 1659) – materials on the history of military Cossack affairs]. Materiały do historii wojskowości, Pułtusk, 2, 113–132. [in Polish]
Perdenia, J. (2000). Hetman Piotr Doroszenko a Polska [Hetman Petro Doroshenko and Poland]. Kraków, 502 p. [in Polish]
Serczyk, Wł. (1979). Historia Ukrainy [The History of Ukraine]. Wrocław, 648 p. [in Polish]
Subtelny, O. (1989). Ukraine. A History. Toronto, Buffalo, London: University of Toronto Press, 666 p. [in English]
Wójcik, Z. (1989).Wojny kozackie w dawnej Polsce [Cossack Wars in Ancient Poland]. Warszawa, 80 p. [inPolish]
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
