THE HISTORICAL PROCESS THROUGH THE PRISM OF THE CULTURAL CIVILIZATIONAL APPROACH: THEPAST AND THE PRESENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24919/2519-058X.20.240039Abstract
The purpose of the researchis to analyze the place and role of the culturalcivilizational approach within the problem field of historical research studies. The research methodology is based on the principles of historicism, objectivity, interdisciplinarity. The authors used hermeneutic, cultural historical, historical logical, transdisciplinary, and integrative approaches. The scientific novelty of the study consists in the justification of the feasibility of further development and use of the cultural andcivilizational approach in contemporary historical science, which has become especially relevant in the context of nowadaysglobalization processes. The Conclusions. The results of the study allow us to conclude that the cultural civilizational approach has a powerful potential to become one of the most fruitful tools of the historical exploration in the new millennium. As the approach enables scientists to combine the study of general and specific in history; to analyze the development trends of both planetary society and local civilizations from the standpoint of contemporary achievements and problems; to understand their logic within the worldview and value system of any given culture. The expansion of the functional field of cultural civilizational approach will promote intercultural dialogue of the members of different regional communities, as well as the representatives of historical science; in this dialogue, the various vectors of socio cultural interaction will not exclude, but will mutually complement each other. Reflecting the long-lasting experience of the thinkers who have sought to build a logically consistent and historically accurate image of the past, the cultural civilizational approach will contribute to a well-grounded explanation of the present and predict the future of the world community. The cultural civilizational approach is a promising tendency in the development of the methodology of historical science, which is able to become the basis of mass historical consciousness contributing to the successful human activity in the contradictory postmodern world. The contemporary cultural civilizational approach has to be “embedded” in a broader context, which requires the joint efforts of historians, philosophers, sociologists, political scientists, theologians, psychologists, anthropologists, etc.
Key words:culturalcivilizational approach, culture, civilization, historical process, theories of local civilizations.
References
Arnason, J. (2010). The Cultural Turnand the Civilizational Approach. European Journal of Social Theory, 13 (1), 67–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431009355866 [in English]
Botz-Bornstein, T. (2012). What is the Difference between Culture and Civilization? Two Hundred Fifty Years of Confusion. Comparative Civilizations Review, 66, 10–28. [in English]
Collingwood, R. J. (1980). Ideya istorii. Avtobiografiya [The Idea of History. Autobiography]. Moscow: Nauka, 486 p. [in Russian]
Danilevsky, N. Ya. (2011). Rossiya i Evropa [Russia and Europe]. Moscow: Institutrusskojczivilizaczii, Blagoslovenie, 816 p. [in Russian]
Danylova, T. (2015). The Way to the Self: The Novel “Steppenwolf” Through the Lens of Jungian Process of Individuation. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 7, 28–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr2015/43391 [inEnglish]
Danylova, T. (2016). The Theory of Civilizations Through the Lens of Contemporary Humanities. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 9, 55–62. DOI 10.15802/ampr2016/72231. [in English]
Danylova, T. V. (2017). Eastern Mysticism and Timothy Leary: Human Beyond the Conventional Reality. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 11, 135–142. DOI:10.15802/ampr.v0i11.105498. [in English]
Danylova, T. V. & Salata, G. V. (2018). The Ecological Imperative and Human Nature: A New Perspective on Ecological Education. Interdisciplinary Studies of Complex Systems, 12, 17–24. [in English]
Eder, K. (2009). A Theory of Collective Identity Making Sense of a Debate on a “European Identity”. European Journal of Social Theory, 12 (4), 427–447. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431009345050 [inEnglish]
Fukuyama, F. (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. NY.: Macmillan, Inc., 418 p. [inEnglish]
Gumilev, L. (2001). Jetnogenez i biosferabZemli [Ethnogenesis and Biosphere of the Earth]. Saint Petersburg: Crystal, 642 p. [in Russian]
Hayek, F.bA. (1943). Scientist andtheStudyofSociety.PartII. Economica, 10 (37), 34–63. [in English]
Honcharevskyi, V. (2011). Tsyvilizatsiinyi pidkhid do istorii: suchasnyi ukrainskyi dosvid (1991 – 2009) [Civilizational Approach to History: Contemporary Ukrainian Experience (1991 – 2009)]. Kyiv: Logos, 220 p. [in Ukrainian]
Huntington, S. (2011). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. Simon&Schuster Paperbacks, 368 p. [in English]
Kumar, K. (2014). The Return of Civilization – and of Arnold Toynbee. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 56 (4), 815–843. [in English]
Pavlenko, Ju. (2002). Istorija mirovoj civilizacii. Filosofskij analiz [The History of the World Civilization. Philosophical Analysis]. Kyiv: Phoenix, 760 p. [in Russian]
Prozorova, Y. (2018). Civilizational Analysis and Archaeology Prospects for Collaboration. In: Anthropology and Civilizational Analysis: Eurasian Explorations. (pp. 53–74). Arnason, J.P., Hann, C. (Eds.). SUNY Press. [in English]
Pylypiv, V. (2020). Kontseptsiia kulturnoi identychnosti v konteksti istorii kultury postmodernoho svitu [The Concept of Cultural Identity in the Context of the Culture’s History of the Postmodern World]. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal [Ukrainian Historical Journal], 1, 172–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/uhj2020.01.172 [in Ukrainian]
Said, E. W. (2003). Orientalism. Penguin Books, 396 p. [in English]
Ševčenko, I. (1996). Ukraine between East and West. Essays on Cultural History to the Early Eighteemth Century. Edmonton-Toronto: Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies Press, XIX+234 p. [in English]
Spengler, O. (2006). The Decline of the West. Vintage, 480 p. [in English]
Spohn, W. (2011). World history, civilizational analysis and historical sociology: Interpretations of non-Western civilizations in the work of Johann Arnason. European Journal of Social Theory, 14 (1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431010394506 [in English]
Toynbee, A. (1987a). A Study of History. Vol. 1: Abridgement of Volumes I-VI. Oxford paperbacks, 640 p.[in English]
Toynbee, A. (1987b). A Study of History, Vol.2: Abridgement of Volumes VII-X. Oxford University Press, USA, 432 p. [in English]
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.