THE CONCEPT OF “UKRAINE” EVOLUTION IN EARLY MODERN TIMES IN MODERN UKRAINIAN HISTORIOGRAPHY COVERAGE

Authors

  • Yuriy STEPANCHUK PhD hab.(History), Docent, Associate Professor of the Department of History and Culture of Ukraine ofVinnytsia State Pedagogical University named after M. Kotsiubynskyi, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6693-1463
  • Tetiana MELNYCHUK PhD (History), Docent of the Department of History and Culture of Ukraine ofVinnytsia State Pedagogical University named after M. Kotsiubynskyi, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6814-142X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24919/2519-058X.18.226552

Abstract

The purpose of the research isto identify the main tendencies of themodern scientific discourse concerning the issue’sevolution interpretation in early modern times of the name “Ukraine”. The methodology of the research involves the comparative studies’ methods symbiosis usage, contextual analysis, convergence from the abstract to the concrete and vice versa. The scientific novelty is determined by the fact that the basic laws of modern scientific discourse in Ukraine, connected with the understanding of the name “Ukraine” functioning in early modern Ukraine and derived concepts: the “Ukrainian people”, the “Ukrainians”. The thematic and conceptual echo between modern interpretations has been traced, the scientific innovations which have appeared recently were allocated, perspective directions of the further researches were outlined. The Conclusions. In the first decades of the XXIst century there has been a renewed research focus on interpretations of the past functioning of the name “Ukraine”, but the emphasis shifted from the problems of the origin and original semantics of this concept to clarify the peculiarities of its use in early modern times. In particular, the concept’scirculation among the Ukrainian nobility and the Cossacks, the place of names “Ukraine”, the “Ukrainian people”, the “Ukrainians” in the practices of the Hetmanate’selite until the end ofthe 70-ies of the ХVIIth century, the functioning of the concept of “Ukraine” in the Cossack narratives of the XVIIIth century was considered. Two important tendencies of scientific discourse were singled out: the evolution of the name “Ukraine” did not go beyond the geographical-territorial framework; the name “Ukraine” became a political name, and the terms the “Ukrainian people” and the “Ukrainians” became the Hetmanate’s elite marker of the identity.

Key words: Ukraine, theUkrainians, the Ukrainian people, modern historiography,scientific discourse, concept, keytendencies.

References

Adadurov, V. (2013).Teoretychni zasady ta metodolohiia vpysuvannia ukrainskoi istorii v yevropeiskyi kontekst (pohliad istoryka-vsesvitnyka) [Theoretical Principles and Methodology of Inscribing the Ukrainian History in the European Context (The View of a World Historian)]. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal, 2, 4–23. [in Ukrainian]

Bahro, S. (2013). Vitchyzna Hryhoriia Hrabianky: mirkuvannia pro poshyrennia poniattia kozatskoi vitchyzny v Hetmanshchyni u kintsi XVII — pershii polovyni XVIII st. [Hryhoriy Grabianka’s Fatherland: Reflections on the Spread of the Concept of the Cossack Fatherland in the Hetmanate in the Late 17th –First Half of the 18th Century]. Sivershchyna v istorii Ukrainy, 6, 188–191. [in Ukrainian]

Balushok, V. (2014). Yak rusyny staly ukraintsiamy (transformatsiia ukrainskoi etnonimii v XIX – XX stolittiakh) [How Ruthenians Became Ukrainians (Transformation of the Ukrainian Ethnonymy in the 19th and 20th Centuries)]. Materialy do ukrainskoi etnolohii, Kyiv, 52–57.[in Ukrainian]

Brekhunenko, V. (2014). Skhidna brama Yevropy.Kozatska Ukraina seredyny XVII – XVIII st. [Eastern Gate of Europe.Cossack Ukraine in the Middle of the XVII – XVIII Centuries.]. Kyiv, Tempora, 504 р. [in Ukrainian]

Brekhunenko, V. (2020). Ukraina y ukraintsi. Imia yak pole bytvy [Ukraine and Ukrainians.Name as a Battlefield]. Kyiv, 272 р. [in Ukrainian]

Brehunenko, V. (2019). Arkhiv rannomodernoi Ukrainskoi derzhavy.Dokumenty kolektsii Oleksandra Lazarevskoho (Seriia: Dokumenty Heneralnoho viiskovoho sudu ta Heneralnoi viiskovoi kantseliarii) [Archive of the Early Modern Ukrainian State.Documents of the Collection of Alexander Lazarevsky (Series: Documents of the General Military Court and the General Military Chancellery)]. Kyiv, 432 р. [in Ukrainian]

Dziuba, O. (2015). “Ukraina” i “Malorosiia”: slova i poniattia v ukrainskii memuarnii literaturi XVIII st. [“Ukraine” and “Malorosiia”: Words and Concepts in the Ukrainian Memoir Literature of the XVIII Century]. Ukraina v Tsentralno-Skhidnii Yevropi, 15, 42–54. [in Ukrainian]

Zashkilniak, L. (2008). Shkilna istoriia ochyma istorykiv-naukovtsiv [School History Through the Eyes of Historians-Scientists]. Materialy Robochoi narady z monitorynhu shkilnykh pidruchnykiv istorii Ukrainy, Kyiv, 77–78. [in Ukrainian]

Kasianov, H. & Tolochko, O. (2012).Natsionalni istorii ta suchasna istoriohrafiia. Vyklyky y nebezpeky pry napysanni novoi istorii Ukrainy, [National Histories and Modern Historiography. Challenges and Dangers in Writing a New History of Ukraine]. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal, 6, 4–24.[in Ukrainian]

Kohut, Z. (2008). Vid Hadiacha do Andrusova: osmyslennia «otchyzny» v ukrainskii politychnii kulturi [From Gadyach to Andrusov: Understanding the «Fatherland» in Ukrainian Political Culture]. Hadiatska uniia 1658 roku. Kyiv, 352 р. [in Ukrainian]

Kravchenko, V. (2011). Ukraina, imperiia, Rosiia.Vybrani statti z modernoi istorii ta istoriohrafii. [Ukraine, Empire, Russia. Selected Articles on Modern History and Historiography]. Kyiv, Krytyka, 544 р. [in Ukrainian]

Makarchuk, S. (1994). Ukraina i ukraintsi: poiava, poshyrennia ta utverdzhennia nazv [Ukraine and Ukrainians: the Emergence, Spread and Adoption of Names]. Druhyi mizhnarodnyi konhres ukrainistiv Lviv 22–28 serpnia 1993 r. Dopovidi i povidomlennia. Istoriohrafiia ukrainoznavstva, etnolohiia, kultura. Lviv, 206–211. [inUkrainian]

Motsia, O. (2007).Yak Rus stavala Ukrainoiu [How Russia Became Ukraine]. In V. A. Smolii (ed.). Terra Cossacorum: Studii z davnoi i novoi istorii Ukrainy. Naukovyi zbirnyk na poshanu profesora Valeriia Stepankova, Kyiv, Instytut istorii Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy, 339–345.[inUkrainian]

Nakonechnyi, Ye. (2001). Ukradene imia: chomu rusyny staly ukraintsiamy [Stolen Name: Why the Ruthenians Became Ukrainians]. Lviv, 242 р. [in Ukrainian]

Rudnytskyi, Ya.(1951). Slovo y nazva “Ukraina” [Word and Name “Ukraine”]. Vinnipeh, 132 р. [in English]

Sas, P. (1998). Politychna kultura ukrainskoho suspilstva (kinets XVI – persha polovyna XVII st.) [Political Culture of the Ukrainian Society (End of XVI – First Half of XVII century)]. Kyiv, 296 р. [in Ukrainian]

Sas, P. (2001). Vid “Rusi” do “Ukrain”» [From “Rusʼ ” to “Ukraine”]. Istoriia ukrainskoi kultury u piaty tomakh, t. 2: Ukrainska kultura XIII – pershoi polovyny XVII stolit, Kyiv, Naukova dumka, 795–800. [inUkrainian]

Sysyn, F. (1982). Regionalism and Political Thought in Seventeenth-Century Ukraine: The Nobility’s Grievances at the Diet of 1641. Harvard Ukrainian Studies, 6, chapt. 2, 167–190. [in English]

Sysyn, F. (1995). Khmelnychchyna ta yii rol v utvorenni modernoi ukrainskoi natsii [Khmelnytsky Region and Its Role in the Formation of the Modern Ukrainian Nation]. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal, 4, 67–77.[inUkrainian]

Sysyn, F. (2006). “Otchyzna” v politychnii kulturi Ukrainy pochatku XVIII st. [«Fatherland» in the Political Culture of Ukraine in the Early XVIII Century]. Ukraina moderna, 10, 7–18. [in Ukrainian]

Smolii, V. & Stepankov, V. (1997). Ukrainska derzhavna ideia XVII – XVIII st.: problemy formuvannia, evoliutsiia, realizatsii [Ukrainian State Idea of the XVII – XVIII Centuries: Problems of Formation, Evolution, Realization]. Kyiv: “Alternatyvy”, 367 р. [in Ukrainian]

Smolii, V. & Stepankov, V. (2014). Ukrainskyi politychnyi proekt XVII st.: stanovlennia natsionalnoho instytutu vlady. [Ukrainian Political Project of the XVII Century: the Formation of a National Institution of Power]. Kyiv: Instytut istorii Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy, 194 р. [in Ukrainian]

Tolochko, P. (1994). Nazva Ukraina v pivdenno-ruskykh litopysakh i aktovykh dokumentakh [Name Ukraine in the South Russian Chronicles and Act Document]. Kyivska starovyna, 3, 2–9. [in Ukrainian]

Chukhlib, T. (2015). Poniattia “Ukraina” ta “Ukrainnyi” v ofitsiinomu dyskursi Viiska Zaporozkoho (1649 – 1659 rr.) [The Concept of “Ukraine” and “Ukrainian” in the Official Discourse of the Zaporozhian Army (1649 – 1659)]. Ukraina v Tsentralno-Skhidnii Yevropi, 15, 13–41. [in Ukrainian]

Chukhlib, T. (2016). Poniattia “Ukraina”, “Ukrainskyi”, “Ukrainska derzhava” v ofitsiinomu dyskursi Viiska Zaporozkoho (1659 – 1665 rr.) [The Concept of “Ukraine”, “Ukrainian”, “Ukrainian State” in the Official Discourse of the Zaporozhian Army (1659 – 1665)]. Ukraina v Tsentralno-Skhidnii Yevropi, 16, 13–46. [in Ukrainian]

Chukhlib, T. (2017). Poniattia “Ukraina”, “ukraintsi”, “Otchyzna”, “narod” v ofitsiinomu dyskursi Viiska Zaporozkoho (1666 – 1672 rr.) [The concept of “Ukraine”, “Ukrainians”, “Moherland”, “People” in the Official Discourse of the Zaporozhian Army (1666 – 1672)]. Ukraina v Tsentralno-Skhidnii Yevropi, 17, 41–79. [inUkrainian]

Chukhlib, T. (2017). “Usi zhyteli ukrainskoi porody…”: movna ta svidomisna evoliutsiia poniattia «narod» u Viisku Zaporozkomu (druha polovyna XVII st.) [“All the Inhabitants of the Ukrainian Breed…”: Linguistic and Conscious Evolution of the Concept of «People» in the Zaporozhian Army (Second Half of the XVII Century)]. Chornomorska mynuvshyna, Odesa, 12, 17–39. [in Ukrainian]

Chukhlib, T. (2019). Poshyrennia nazvy “Ukraina” v ofitsiinomu dyskursi Rechi Pospolytoi yak odyn iz naslidkiv Liublinskoi unii 1569 r. [Dissemination of the Name “Ukraine” in the Official Discourse of Rich Pospolyta as One of the Consequences of the Union of Lublin in 1569]. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal, 1, 4–24. [in Ukrainian]

Shelukhin, S. (1936). Ukraina – nazva nashoi zemli z naidavnishykh chasiv [Ukraine is the Name of Our Land From Ancient Times]. Praha, 248 р. [in Ukrainian]

Yakovenko, N. (1997). Narys istorii serednovichnoi ta rannomodernoi istorii Ukrainy [Essay on the History of Medieval and Early Modern History of Ukraine]. Vydannia druhe, pereroblene ta rozshyrene. Kyiv: Krytyka, 382 р. [in Ukrainian]

Yakovenko, N. (2012). Dzerkala identychnosti. Doslidzhennia z istorii uiavlen ta idei v Ukraini XVI – pochatku XVIII stolittia [Mirrors of Identity. Research on the History of Ideas in Ukraine in the XVI – Early XVIII Centuries]. Kyiv, Krytyka, 472 р. [in Ukrainian]

Published

2021-03-30

How to Cite

STEPANCHUK, Y. ., & MELNYCHUK, T. . . (2021). THE CONCEPT OF “UKRAINE” EVOLUTION IN EARLY MODERN TIMES IN MODERN UKRAINIAN HISTORIOGRAPHY COVERAGE. EAST EUROPEAN HISTORICAL BULLETIN, (18), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.24919/2519-058X.18.226552

Issue

Section

Articles