LEGAL REGULATION OF LOCAL POPULATION BEHAVIOUR IN THE RESPONSIBILITY AREA OF THE PROVISIONAL MILITARY ADMINISTRATION AND REICH COMMISSARIAT “UKRAINE” (THE SUMMER OF 1941 – WINTER OF 1942)

Authors

  • Oleksiy HONCHARENKO PhD hab. (History), Professor of the Department of History and Culture of Ukraine, SHEI “Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi Hryhoriy Skovoroda State Pedagogical University”, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8882-6397
  • Oleksandr POTYL’CHAK Oleksandr POTYL’CHAK PhD hab. (History), Professor, Head of Department of Original and Special Historical Sciences of the National Pedagogical Drahomanov University, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3518-9280

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24919/2519-058X.18.226506

Abstract

 The purpose of the research – to analyze the normative and legal influence of the Provisional Military Administration (hereinafter – the PMA) and the leadership of the Reich Commissariat “Ukraine” (hereinafter – the RCU), which was aimed at the observance of a lawful behaviour by the local population of occupied Ukraine. The methodology of the research is based on the application of the principles of systematicity, scientificity and historicism, as well as such methods of scientific knowledge as analysis, synthesis and comparison. The scientific novelty consists in the analysis of the normative measures of the occupation administrations to ensure the lawful behaviour of the local population. The Conclusions. After the successful occupation of the part of the Ukrainian lands by the German troops in 1941, the occupation administration faced the problem of regulating the observance of a lawful behaviour by the local population. Therefore, an important element of the work of the occupation administrations of the RCU and PMA was the creation of a full-fledged legal framework on the basis of which the influence on the lawful behaviour of the occupied society was exerted. During the first period of the occupation, before the emergence of a stable regulatory framework, the German administration applied the principle of combining and sometimes "imposing" two legal systems – the Soviet and Hitler's. Exceptions were the laws, which denied the occupation, as well as the cases, in which the German regulations directly repealed certain Soviet legal norms. Almost similar appeals were repeated by the administration of the RCU, which took the place of the PMA. In fact, the normative acts of the PMA and the RCU abolished the Soviet legislation in terms of the state system, political regime and electoral system, but certain provisions of substantive law continued to be applied. Faced with the problems of lack of legal framework for the regulation of legal relations at the occupied territory, the administrators of the PMA and the RCU started applying the part of the regulatory framework, which functioned in the Third Reich. In the middle of 1942, the RCU administration created a separate normative act that regulated the criminal penalties of those members of the local population, who committed petty crimes and offenses. At the same time, the order was issued in the RCU regulating family and partly civil legal relations of the local population. In the PMA area, these transformations were never carried out. The heads of each of the field military commandant's offices issued their own regulations, without codifying or reconciling them.

Key words: occupation regime, Reich Commissariat "Ukraine", provisional military administration, local population, lawful behaviour.

References

Berkhoff, К. (2011). Zhnyva rozpachu. Zhyttia i smert v Ukraini pid natsystskoiu vladoiu [Harvest of Despair: Life and Death in Ukraine under the Nazi Rule]. Kyiv: Krytyka, 455 p. [in Ukrainian]

Derzhavnyi arkhiv Dnipropetrovskoi oblasti [State Archives of Dnipropetrovsk Region – SADR]

Derzhavnyi arkhiv Khersonskoi oblasti [State Archives of Kherson Region – SAKhR]

Derzhavnyi arkhiv Kirovohradskoi oblasti [State Archives of Kirovohrad Region – SAKirR]

Derzhavnyi arkhiv Kyivskoi oblasti [State Archives of Kyiv Region – SAKR]

Derzhavnyi arkhiv Poltavskoi oblasti [State Archives of Poltava Region – SAPR]

Derzhavnyi arkhiv Rivnenskoi oblasti [State Archives of Rivne Region – SARR]

Derzhavnyi arkhiv Vinnytskoi oblasti [State Archives of Vinnytsia Region – SAVR]

Derzhavnyi arkhiv Zhytomyrskoi oblasti [State Archives of Zhytomyr Region].

Honcharenko, O.M. (2011). Funktsionuvannia okupatsiinoi administratsii Raikhskomisariatu “Ukraina”: upravlinsko-rozporiadchi ta orhanizatsiino-pravovi aspekty (1941 –1944 rr.) [Functioning of the occupational administration of the Reichs Commissariat “Ukraine”: administrative and organizational legal aspects (1941–1944)]. Kyiv: NPU imeni M.P.Drahomanova, 600 p. [in Ukrainian]

Honcharenko, O.M., Kunytskyi, M.P. & Lysenko, O.Ye. (2014). Systema orhaniv mistsevoho upravlinnia na terytorii raikhskomisariatu «Ukraina» ta «viiskovoi zony». 1941 –1944 rr. [The system of local government bodies at the territory of Reich Commissariat “Ukraine” and “military zone” 1941 –1944 rr.]. Kyiv: NAN Ukrainy. Instytut istorii Ukrainy, 151 p. [in Ukrainian].

Ivanenko, A. (2018). Аttemрs to creаte cіvіl аnd рrocedurаl norms іn Ukrаіne during the рerіod of the Nаzі occuраtіon (аutumn of 1941). Pereiaslavskyi litopys – Pereiaslav chronicle, 14, 28–35. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.2267812. [in Ukrainian].

Ivanenko, A. (2019). Peculiarities in the creation of Civil Procedures Law during the period of the Nazi occupation of Ukraine (1941 – 1944). Skhidnoievropeiskyi istorychnyi visnyk – East European Historical Bulletin, 11, 159–168. DOI: 10.24919/2519-058x.11.170710. [in Ukrainian].

Kucher, V. & Potyl’chak O. (2011). Ukraina 1941–1944: trahediia narodu za fasadom Sviashchennoi viiny [Ukraine during 1941–1944: the tragedy of the people behind the facade of Holy War]. Kyiv, Bila Tserkva: TOV «Bilotserkivdruk», 368 p. [in Ukrainian].

Kunytskyi, M. P. (2014). Sotsialno-pravovyi status mistsevoho naselennia Raikhskomisariatu «Ukraina» (1941 – 1944 rr.). [Socio-legal status of the local population of the Reich Commissariat of Ukraine (1941 – 1944)]. Kyiv: PP “NVTs “Profi”, 564 p. [in Ukrainian].

Levchenko, Yu. (2011). The judicial apparatus of the German administrative territorial units of Ukraine during the years of occupation 1941–1944. Visnyk akademii pratsi i sotsialnykh vidnosyn federatsii profspilok Ukrainy – Journal of Academy of Labour, Social Relations

Federation of Trade Unions of Ukraine, 4 (60),115–120. [in Ukrainian]

Potyl’chak, O. (1997). Ekonomichnyi kolaboratsionizm v Ukraini v roky natsystskoi okupatsii (1941 – 1944): prychyny i proiavy [Economic collaboration in Ukraine during the Nazi occupation (1941 – 1944): causes and manifestations]. Kyiv: Ukrainskyi derzhavnyi pedahohichnyi universytet imeni M.P.Drahomanova, 29 p. [in Ukrainian]

Rekotov, P.V. (1997) Governing bodies in the occupied territory of Ukraine (1941–1944). Ukrains'kyj istorychnyj zhurnal – Ukrainian Historical Journal, 3, 90–101. [in Ukrainian]

Shaikan, V.O. (2005). Kolaboratsionizm na terytorii Reikhskomisariatu “Ukraina” ta viiskovoi zony v period Druhoi svitovoi viiny [Collaboration at the territory of the Reichs Commissariat “Ukraine” and the military zone during World War II]. Kryvyi Rih: Mineral, 564 p. [in Ukrainian]

Snyder, T. (2011). Kryvavi zemli: Yevropa pomizh Hitlerom ta Stalinym [Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin]. Kyiv: Hrani-Т, 448 p. [in Ukrainian]

Tsentralnyi derzhavnyi arkhiv vyshchykh orhaniv vlady i upravlinnia Ukrainy [Central State Archive of the highest authorities and administration of Ukraine – CSAHAAU]

Published

2021-03-30

Issue

Section

Articles