UKRAINIAN HISTORICAL SCIENCE IN THE SECOND POLISH REPUBLIC: INSTITUTIONAL ASPECT

Authors

  • Vitalii TELVAK Professor at Department of World History and Special Historical Disciplines, Ivan Franko Drohobych State Pedagogical University,
  • Iryna LOZYNSKA Associate Professor of the Departament of World History and Special Historical Disciplines, Ivan Franko Drohobych State Pedagogical University,
  • Roman NOWACKI Ph.D., hab. (History), Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Opole University of Technology,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24919/2519-058x.16.210905

Keywords:

Ukrainian historiography, scientific institutions, Second Polish Republic, Shevchenko Scientific Society, Ukrainian scientific institute

Abstract

Thepurposeofthestudyistoreconstruct the institutional structure of the Ukrainian historical science in the Second Polish Republic. Themethodologiicalfoundationofthestudyisan interdisciplinaryapproach. Primarily, it is a structural-functional systemic analysis of historiographical facts and a comparative historical method, based on the principle of objectivity and historicism. We also apply the methods of periodisation, classification and typologisation.Thescientificnovelty of this articleisthecomplexanalysisoftheinstitutionalhistoryofthe UkrainianHumanitiesduringthetimesofinterwarPoland. The Conclusions. The UkrainianscientistsintheinterwarPolandsometimes collaboratedwiththePolishgovernment, however, mostly, theyopposeditsnationalculturalpolicy.Regardlessthedynamics of their relationship, theymanagedtoadapttotheexistingconditionsquitewell. They preserved the existing institutional potential of the Ukrainian Humanities, while adequately reacting to social political and cultural challenges.Despitea chronicalpovertyandlackoffinancialresources, theyinitiatedthefoundationofneworganisationalstructuresthat were designed to moderate the most dynamic branches of the Ukrainian studies.Another peculiar feature was that the UkrainianscienceofthosetimeswasdividedbetweenWarsawandLviv. Unfortunately, despite the presence of an active communication between Galician and Dnipro scholars in emigration, they did not manage to establish a solid interinstitutional collaboration.Asaresult, someorganisationalstructuresjustobtainedtheir “twins”, which, ifweconsiderscarcefinancialandhumanresources, ledtounjustifiedexpenses. Moreover, it led to incoherence in scientific projects and thus, to personal conflicts.Nevertheless, those institutions were of a crucial importance, as the emigrants later relocated them to the countries of the “free world”. That helped the Ukrainian science to survive the communist regime and preserve the institutional memory

References

Hyrych, I. (1999). Do istorii UMMAN. Komentar [On the history of UMMAS. Commentary]. Pam‘iatky Ukrainy [Sights of Ukraine], 1, 139–140. [in Ukrainian]

Hlynka, L. & Chekhovych, K. (1934). Bohoslovske Naukove Tovarystvo u Lvovi v pershim desiatylittiu svoho isnuvannia (1923 – 33) [Theological Scientific Society in Lviv in the first decade of its existence (1923 – 33)]. Lviv, 92 p. [in Ukrainian]

Zashkilniak, L. (2014). Ukrainska istoriohrafiia u mizhvoiennii Polshchi: shliakhy lehitymatsii natsionalnoi istorii [Ukrainian historiography in interwar Poland: ways of legitimizing national history]. Ukraine on the Historiographic Map of Interwar Europe: Materials of international scientific conference: Ukraina na istoriohrafichnii mapi mizhvoiennoi Yevropy: Materialy mizhnarodnoi naukovoi konferentsii. Miunkhen, Nimechchyna, 1–3 lypnia 2012 r. (pp. 149–166). Кyiv. [in Ukrainian]

Kyrychuk, O. (2000). Stavropihiiskyi instytut u Lvovi (1914 – 1924 rr.) [Stauropegion Institute in Lviv (1914 – 1924)]. Ukraina: kulturna spadshchyna, natsionalna svidomist, derzhavnist [Ukraine: Cultural Heritage, National Identity, Statehood], 6, 335–340. [in Ukrainian]

Kysil, Z. (2001). Ukrainske voienno-istorychne tovarystvo (1920 – 1939) [Ukrainian Military Historical Society (1920 – 1939)]. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal [Ukrainian Historical Journal], 2, 100–112. [in Ukrainian]

Komar, V. (2011). Kontseptsiia prometeizmu v politytsi Polshchi (19211939 rr.) [The Concept of Prometheism in the Politics of Poland (19211939)]. Ivano-Frankivsk, 360 p. [in Ukrainian]

Kots-Hryhorchuk, L. (1998). Ilarion Svientsitskyi – muzeinyi diiach [Ilarion Sventsitskyi as a museum activist]. Pamiatky Ukrainy [Sights of Ukraine], 1, 18–27. [in Ukrainian]

Kubiiovych, V. (1991). Narys istorii Naukovoho Tovarystva im. Shevchenka (18731949) [An outline of the history of the Shevchenko Scientific Society (18731949)]. Lviv, 53 p. [in Ukrainian]

Masnenko, V. (2001). Istorychna dumka ta natsiotvorennia v Ukraini (kinets XIX – persha tretyna XX st.) [Historical thought and national creation in Ukraine (end of XIX - first third of XX century)]. Kyiv-Cherkasy, 440 p. [in Ukrainian]

Naida, O. (1998). Okremi aspekty diialnosty Istorychno-filosofichnoi sektsii Naukovoho tovarystva im. Shevchenka. 1913 – 1940 roky [Some aspects of the activity of the Historical and Philosophical Section of the Shevchenko Scientific Society 1913 – 1940]. From the history of SSS: Collection of reports and scientific notes of SSS sections and conferences in Lviv: Z istorii Naukovoho tovarystva im. Shevchenka: Zbirnyk dopovidei i povidomlen naukovykh sektsii i konferentsii NTSh u Lvovi, (pp. 24–31). Lviv. [in Ukrainian]

Orlevych, I. (2009). Lvivskyi stavropihiiskyi instytut (1914–1925) [Lviv Stauropegion Institute (1914–1925)]. Ukraina: kulturna spadshchyna, natsionalna svidomist, derzhavnist [Ukraine: Cultural Heritage, National Identity, Statehood]. 18, 153–169. [in Ukrainian]

Pokazhchyk (1999). Pokazhchyk publikatsii Ukrainskoi Mohyliansko-Mazepynskoi Akademii Nauk [Index of Publications of the Ukrainian Mohyla-Mazepa Academy of Science]. Pam‘iatky Ukrainy [Sights of Ukraine], 1, 141–144. [in Ukrainian]

Portnov, A. (2009). Nauka u vyhnanni. Naukova i osvitnia diialnist ukrainskoi emihratsii u mizhvoiennii Polshchi (1919 – 1939) [Science in exile. Scientific and educational activities of Ukrainian emigration in interwar Poland (1919 1939)]. Kharkiv, 256 p. [in Ukrainian]

Portnov, A. (2006). Studium pravoslavnoho bohoslovia Varshavskoho universytetu (1925 – 1939) [Studies of Orthodox Theology, Warsaw University (1925 – 1939)]. Ukrainskyi arkheohrafichnyi shchorichnyk [Ukrainian Archeographic Year Book], 1011, 386–397. [in Ukrainian]

Portnov, A. (2004). Ukrainskyi Naukovyi Instytut u Varshavi (1930 – 1939) [Ukrainian Science Institute in Warsaw (1930 – 1939)]. Ucrainica-Polonica [Ucrainica-Polonica]. 1, 257–263. [in Ukrainian]

Potulnytskyi, V. A. (1999). Ukrainskyi naukovyi instytut u Varshavi (1930 – 1939) [Ukrainian Science Institute in Warsaw (1930 – 1939)]. Ukrainskyi arkheohrafichnyi shchorichnyk [Ukrainian Archeographic Year Book], 3–4, 356–369. [in Ukrainian]

Rudnytskyi, Yar. (1999). Ukrainska Mohyliansko-Mazepynska Akademiia Nauk [Ukrainian Mohyla-Mazepa Academy of Sciences]. Пам‘ятки України [Sights of Ukraine], 1, 132–138. [in Ukrainian]

Svientsitskyi, I. (1930). XXV lit diialnosti Natsionalnoho muzeiu. Dvaitsiatpiatlittia Natsionalnoho muzeiu u Lvovi: Zbirnyk [XXV years of activity of the National Museum. Twenty-fifth anniversary of the National Museum in Lviv: Collection]. Lviv, 59 p. [in Ukrainian]

Ukrainskyi Naukovyi Instytut (1935). Ukrainskyi Naukovyi Instytut za pʼiat lit yoho isnuvannia 13.III.1930 – 13.III.1935 [Ukrainian Scientific Institute during five years of its existence 13.III.1930 - 13.III.1935]. Varshava, 19 p. [in Ukrainian]

Yaniv, V. (1970). Narys istorii Ukrainskoho Bohoslovskoho Naukovoho Tovarystva (UBNT) [Essay on the History of Ukrainian Theological Scientific Society (UBNT)]. Studies and materials of new Ukrainian history: Studii ta materiialy do novoi ukrainskoi istorii, (pp. 3–64). Miunkhen. [in Ukrainian]

Downloads

How to Cite

TELVAK, V., LOZYNSKA, I., & NOWACKI, R. (2020). UKRAINIAN HISTORICAL SCIENCE IN THE SECOND POLISH REPUBLIC: INSTITUTIONAL ASPECT. EAST EUROPEAN HISTORICAL BULLETIN, (16), 176–183. https://doi.org/10.24919/2519-058x.16.210905

Issue

Section

Articles