AWAKENING OF NON–TITULAR NATIONS AS A FACTOR OF THE BREAKUP OF EMPIRES (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE HABSBURG MONARCHY)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24919/2519-058x.13.188673Keywords:
Habsburg monarchy, non-titular peoples, national awakening, national-state revivalAbstract
The purpose of the study is to show the influence of the national awakening of non-titular ethnic groups in the Habsburg monarchy on the development of disintegration processes in the state. The methodology of the research is based on the principles of historicism, systemicity, author's objectivity, as well as on the use of general scientific (analysis, synthesis, generalization) and special-historical (historical-genetic, historical-typological, historical-system) methods. The scientific novelty consists in a comprehensive study of the main factors influencing the process of national-state revival of non-titular peoples of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. This is, in particular, the study of the impact on the processes of national consolidation of the territorial-political organization of the monarchy, locally-provincial or land-regional representative institutions, the place and social significance of the national elite of the non-titular peoples of the Habsburg monarchy in the formation of a national idea. The Conclusions. The authors are convinced that, being a random creation of history, the Habsburg monarchy for a long time combined the spiritual and cultural potential of the peoples of the empire with the political practice of the Austrian ruling dynasty. However, even taking into account the authority of the Danube monarchy as a factor in the multi-ethnic composition of the population, which had a beneficial effect on the development of the national culture of the Czechs, Slovaks, Hungarians, Poles, Ukrainians, Croats and other ethnic groups, which, at the same time, became the basis for the formation of national-state formations of non-titular peoples of the empire , was unable to stop the process of disintegration of the Austro-Hungarian Empire in the final phase of the World War I.References
Averbuh, R. (1965). Revolyutsiya i natsionalno-osvoboditelnaya borba v Vengrii 1848 – 1849. [The revolutionary and national liberation struggle in Hungary]. Moskva. URL: http://istmat.info/files/uploads.pdf [in Russian]
Bogdanov, Yu. V. (ed.) (2003). Istoriya Slovakii [History of Slovakia]. (per. so slovats. I. A. Bogdanovoy, V. V. Marinoy). Moskva, 435 s. [in Russian]
Glants, T. (2004). Cheshskaya versiya yazyikovogo stroitelstva. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 68. [Czech version of language construction. New literary review]. URL: http://: magazines.russ.ru/glan–pr.html. [in Russian]
Gradovskiy, A. D. (1899). Sistema Metterniha [Metternich System]. (in 9 v., V. 3). (pp. 545–613). Sankt-Peterburg: Tip. M. M. Stasyulevicha. [in Russian]
Viddil rukopisnih fondiv i tekstologiyi institutu literaturi im. T. G. Shevchenka NAN Ukrayini. Prosba duhovenstva pri razdele Avstrii 1849 g. [The request of the clergy during the partition of Austria (1849 y.) Manuscripts and Textual Studies. Shevchenko Institute of Literature – MTSSIL]. Viddil rukopisnih fondiv i tekstologiyi institutu literaturi im. T. G. Shevchenka (), f. XXI, р. 1211–1213 [in Russian].
Tsentralnyiy Gosudarstvennyiy Istoricheskiy Arhiv Ukrainyi, g.Kiev. Zapiska russkogo naroda Galitsii. Lvov. 31.07.1848 r. [Note from the Russian people of Galicia. Lviv 31.07.1848 y. (Central State Historical Archives of Ukraine, Kyiv – CSHAUK)]. Tsentralniy derzhavniy istorichniy arhiv Ukrayini, m. Kiyiv, f. 442, in. 798, ar. 153, p. 437–438 [in Russian].
Kirilina, L. A. (2011). Istoriya Slovenii [History of Slovenia]. Sankt-Peterburg, 480 p. [in Russian]
Korovitsyina, N. V. (2006). Cheshskaya identichnost: ob osobennostyah adaptatsii [Czech identity: about features of adaptation]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, (9), 102–109 [in Russian]
Leschilovskaya, I. I., & Freydzon, V. I. (1973). Revolyutsiya 1848–1849 godov i ugnetennyie narodyi Avstriyskoy imperii. [The revolution of 1848-1849 and the oppression of the peoples of the Austrian Empire]. Sovetskoe slavyanovedenie, (3), 29–50. [in Russian]
Mayboroda, O. M. (2015). Etnichnist u mizhnarodniy sistemi [Ethnicity and international systems]. KiYiv: IPIEND Im. I. F. Kurasa NAN Ukrayini, 408 p. [in Ukrainian]
Niderhauzer, E. (1998). Slavyanskie narodyi imperii Gabsburgov v revolyutsii v 1848 g. [Slavic peoples of the Habsburg empire in the revolution of 1848 y.]. Slavyanovedenie, (6), 29–42. [in Russian]
About separation from Hungary and the accession of Russians to Austria. 12.12.1848. [Translate the name into English]. CSHAUK, f. 442, in. 793, ar. 433, p. 159–161 [in Russian].
Palatskiy, F. (1869). Pismo vo Frankfurtskiy parlament [Переклад назви англійською]. Popov N. A. Rossiya i Serbiya. (ch. 2, pp. 254–259). Moskva. [in Russian]
The request of the clergy. About the accession of Russians from the Hungarian regions to Lviv. February – March 1849 y. Tulchin. [Translate the name into English]. VRFT NAN, f.21, № 1211–1213, 6 ark. [in Russian].
Snegirev, I. (1884). Iosif Dobrovskiy ego zhizn, ucheno-literaturnyie trudyi i zaslugi dlya slavyanovedeniya [Translate the name into English]. Kazan, 366 s. [in Russian].
About a trip to Vienna of deputies. The request to separate Galicia from the Austrian monarchy. 02.08.1848 y. [Translate the name into English]. CSHAUK, f. 442, in. 798, spr. 153, p. 354–355 [in Russian].
Freydzon, V. I. (1998). O natsionalnom vozrozhdenii i posleduyuschem periode v istorii Tsentralnoy Evropyi [Translate the name into English]. In Tsentralnaya Evropa v novoe i noveyshee vremya. (pp. 87–112). Moskva. [in Russian]
Freydzon, V. I. (1999). Natsiya do natsionalnogo gosudarstva. [Translate the name into English]. Dubna: Izdatelskiy tsentr “Feniks”, 96 p. [in Russian]
Freydzon, V. I. (2001). Istoriya Horvatii. [Translate the name into English]. Sankt-Peterburg, 318 p. [in Russian]
Hroh Miroslav. (2011) Konsensusnoe ob'yasnenie formirovaniya natsiy [Переклад назви англійською]. Voprosyi filosofii, (1). Retrieved from: http ://www.perspektivy.info/book.htm [in Russian].
Shafarik, P. Y. – Bodyanskomu, O. M. Pismo. Praga. 19. 09. 1841. [Переклад назви англійською]. Pisma. [Izdano P. A. Lavrovyim] (ss. 141). Moskva, 1895.
Shpis, A. (1982). Osnovnyie chertyi sotsialnogo razvitiya Slovakii v kontse XVIII – pervoy polovine XIX vv. [Переклад назви англійською]. Stranyi Tsentralnoy i Yugo-Vostochnoy Evropyi (ss. 125–136). Moskva: Nauka [in Russian].